Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-29-2022, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,105 posts, read 2,727,097 times
Reputation: 5884

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
Proof to moving 50 illegals to Martha’s Vineyard costing $12M?
That 12 million could of been used for hurricane ian instead of a publicity stunt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2022, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,218,646 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofball86 View Post
That 12 million could of been used for hurricane ian instead of a publicity stunt.
The idea that it cost $12M to move 50 illegals is hilarious. Please provide proof to your claim?

And billions spent on illegal immigrants each year could be used for folks that are hear legally. Funny how billions in taxpayers money is ignored
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Arizona
6,105 posts, read 2,727,097 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
The idea that it cost $12M to move 50 illegals is hilarious. Please provide proof to your claim?

And billions spent on illegal immigrants each year could be used for folks that are hear legally. Funny how billions in taxpayers money is ignored
It doesn't matter how much it cost it was a publicity stunt. that 12 million is Desantis's personal slush fund.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,218,646 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofball86 View Post
It doesn't matter how much it cost it was a publicity stunt. that 12 million is Desantis's personal slush fund.
In other words, it didn’t cost $12M…and the billions that it costs taxpayers for illegals every year is still ignored, lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 08:16 PM
 
Location: az
13,754 posts, read 8,009,665 times
Reputation: 9413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
It's not like she'll be the only identity-bait in an open primary if there is one. And if it comes down to Newsome versus Harris... yeah, he'll absolutely mop the floor with her.

Identity politics matters deeply to the most active, vocal Dem voters, and they comprise a small sliver of the voting public. Your average Joe Voter living a quiet, dignified life just doesn't give a rip.
Harris did a terrible job in the Dem primary yet ended up as VP. And if she's forced to fight Newsom she won't like it and it won't be pretty. But say Newsom does wins he'll probably go with Stacey Abrams. She's also a poor candidate and will likely have lost GA twice but she does have national name recognition. And being a Black woman she checks of the right boxes to offset Harris.

Newsom? California has seen better days. Much better days. I'm an ex-Californian (San Francisco) and he'll need every bit of a 1.5-2 billion war chest to sell himself outside of Dem strongholds.

Last edited by john3232; 09-29-2022 at 08:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 08:29 PM
 
32,071 posts, read 15,072,790 times
Reputation: 13691
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
You can put the link since the top 5 issues for the midterms are not the 2020 elections.


Why do you think they would vote for him if he runs again?????? Simple. Inflation, gas, border and crime. 4 topics that Democrats have failed. Are those good enough reasons?
Why would anyone in their right mind vote to re elect a former president that they voted out in the last election. They voted him out for a reason. They have moved on and are looking for a better candidate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,218,646 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Why would anyone in their right mind vote to re elect a former president that they voted out in the last election. They voted him out for a reason. They have moved on and are looking for a better candidate
Because many have realized the error of their ways in voting for a demented old man that has no idea what he’s doing and has created countless debacles in the last 18 months, and approval ratings have shown it. Aghan debacle, skyrocketing Bidenflation, skyrocketing violent crime, border crisis, etc…, along with war due to being able to keep the peace with foreign leaders like his predecessor is unpopular. Contrary to your belief, not everyone despises because Trump like yourself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Brackenwood
9,984 posts, read 5,684,706 times
Reputation: 22138
Quote:
Originally Posted by john3232 View Post
Harris did a terrible job in the Dem primary yet ended up as VP. And if she's forced to fight Newsom she won't like it and it won't be pretty. But say Newsom does wins he'll probably go with Stacey Abrams. She's also a poor candidate and will likely have lost GA twice but she does have national name recognition. And being a Black woman she checks of the right boxes to offset Harris.

Newsom? California has seen better days. Much better days. I'm an ex-Californian (San Francisco) and he'll need every bit of a 1.5-2 billion war chest to sell himself outside of Dem strongholds.
Biden chose Harris as his running mate, not the party voters. Not many of them were heard clamoring for her VP selection.

Newsom doesn't have to sell himself outside of Dem strongholds to become the nominee. Those are the places that overwhelmingly SELECT the nominee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 08:43 PM
 
Location: az
13,754 posts, read 8,009,665 times
Reputation: 9413
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Why would anyone in their right mind vote to re elect a former president that they voted out in the last election. They voted him out for a reason. They have moved on and are looking for a better candidate
Buyers remorse. They realize they made a mistake voting for Biden. If 2024 is a rematch Trump should have a very good chance of winning esp. if the Rep have a big night this Nov.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2022, 08:49 PM
 
Location: az
13,754 posts, read 8,009,665 times
Reputation: 9413
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey View Post
Biden chose Harris as his running mate, not the party voters. Not many of them were heard clamoring for her VP selection.

Newsom doesn't have to sell himself outside of Dem strongholds to become the nominee. Those are the places that overwhelmingly SELECT the nominee.

I understand but why was she chosen after such a poor performance in the primaries? Because she's a Black woman and media darling. Besides if not her...who then? Warren? Don't think so. My guess is Stacey Abrams was runner up. Remember the VP slot had to be a woman

Newsom doesn't have to sell himself outside of Dem strongholds to become the nominee.

I was referring to the problems he'll face in a general election given Cal isn't what it used to be.

Last edited by john3232; 09-29-2022 at 09:33 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top