Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're conflating the Arabs and Turks, which invaded those regions at a much later date, with the people who invented those things.
With your version of history, in another 2,000 years people will be claiming that it was the African, Mestizo, and Arab "historical Americans" who they then currently see as the primary inhabitants of the North American Landmass who invented the airplane and then later went to the moon.
Arabs - and the large number of people they absorbed as they were not tribals-conquered the wealthiest cultures at that time. Persians, Syrians, the richest part of the Eastern Roman Empire, North Africa, which was very rich and Hispania,
Thet set Madrases or universities which copied all the culture of the classical world, and produced important intellectuals in Cordoba, the capital of Europe in the 8th century.
Later, the great Catholic Orders of the Cister and Benedictin Rule retranslated those documents from Arab into Latin and culture started to spread.
The historical Americans are Amerindians, and in one hundred years most will be chinese and hispanic, and the rest will live in the prairies,
Last edited by farinello; 02-07-2018 at 08:35 PM..
If you care so much about your nations identity well let me tell you, don't worry about these numbers... here in the U.S many of these people will assimilate well into the culture of the nation and will just be part of the nations history...
Many Blacks, Asians and Hispanics in America today are about as American as you can get and they make their own great contributions to the nations culture... I'm sure the same will happen in Europe.
For many, Europe is becoming a really diverse place! Here in INED Research we have concluded by 2030 many countries will drop greatly in European percentage ....
Countries By European or White Percentage 2010
Austria: ~91.7%
Belgium: ~89.5%
Denmark: 94.8%
France: ~86.4%
Germany: 89.6%
Ireland: 94.8%
Italy: 97.1%
Netherlands: 84.6%
Norway: 92.5%
Poland: 99.5%
Portugal: 98.9%
Spain: 93.8%
Sweden: ~89.4%
Switzerland: ~92.0%
United Kingdom: 87.1%
Countries By European Percentage 2030
Austria: ~85.2%
Belgium: ~82.7%
Denmark: 91.9%
France: ~81.6%
Germany: 85.4%
Ireland: 91.5%
Italy: 92.8%
Netherlands: 79.6%
Norway: 87.6%
Poland: 99.4%
Portugal: 96.5%
Spain: 93.7%
Sweden: ~74.0%
Switzerland: ~87.0%
United Kingdom: 78.9%
This is a demographic change that will change Europe's cultural landscape
We already see some European cities almost at half European origin, like Rotterdam (53%), The Hague (56%), and London (59%).
And some more down the line, Brussels (63%), Paris (65%), Malmo (69%), Amsterdam (68%), Stockholm (71%), and a few English cities ranging from 55% to 80% White like Manchester, Slough, Birmingham, and Luton.
Other countries like USA will drop from 63% European to 55% European, Canada from 76% to 65% and Australia from 81% to 66% in the same time frame ... New Zealand will drop from 72% to 65% European.
This is being done for nefarious reasons. The global elite want every Western country to look and feel like every other. Not just with racial and ethnic diversity, but with the standardization of all systems (health, welfare, urban planning, etc.). This breaks down a sense of individual national identity and wears down resistance to a global government dictatorship, making it much easier to centralize power and control in fewer and fewer hands. Notice the globalists don't care about "diversity" in Saudi Arabia, Africa, or Asian countries.
But it will happen in a very slow pace repleaced by caucasians, as Europe will always be caucasian.
Not the resettled new lands like US or US....or Argelia.
This is being done for nefarious reasons. The global elite want every Western country to look and feel like every other. Not just with racial and ethnic diversity, but with the standardization of all systems (health, welfare, urban planning, etc.). This breaks down a sense of individual national identity and wears down resistance to a global government dictatorship, making it much easier to centralize power and control in fewer and fewer hands. Notice the globalists don't care about "diversity" in Saudi Arabia, Africa, or Asian countries.
First of all it isn’t the global elite pushing anything. Clearly the inevitable beliefs of western culture which isn’t tribalism will lead to more racial diversity than other areas. Also you said Saudi Arabia. Which ironically is very diverse, Saudi Citizens are 90% Arab and 10% Afro-Asian and 33% of the country is foreigners who with reforms might eventually get citizenship. So you end up with only 60% of the population being ethnically or racial Arab. More diverse than even America racially. Africa and Asia are either just as diverse ethnically and linguistically as Europe or more so. Malaysia itself is only 60% Malay or 60% SE Asian if you consider that delegate from East Asians. Again even if you count the Asians as one group it is still 90% Asian with a growing population of foreigners and a large Indian minority. Linguistically and Ethnically their is no European country as diverse as Nigeria, South Africa, Ghana or Indonesia. Switzerland is the closest. People like to peddle the lie that only Europe is getting more diverse. Not only is Europe the least racially diverse continent it is also is home to the least linguistically diverse nations of any continent but Latin America as well as the least ethnically diverse nations.
People like to peddle the lie that only Europe is getting more diverse. Not only is Europe the least racially diverse continent it is also is home to the least linguistically diverse nations of any continent but Latin America as well as the least ethnically diverse nations.
I wouldn't say Europe is less racially diverse than Africa or Asia.
Why Europe is less ethnically and linguistically diverse than most of the rest of the old world is that most of our centralised nation states are old and have united under a certain umbrella, like "French" or "German" or "Swedish". For the same reason we have killed off most of our minority languages already, and many languages have merged into languages like "French" and "German" and "Swedish".
For example Belgium has three official languages, but Belgian languages historically spoken also include Walloon, Picard, Champenois, Limburgish, Low Dietsch, Luxembourgish and Yiddish.
Countries like France have around 35 languages either extinct or in the process of becoming extinct.
Give Asia and Africa a couple of hundred years of centralised nationalism and most of their current small languages and ethnicities will die out too.
If you are suggesting that Obama's actions and rule did not reflect the history, mores, and values of Western civilization, your credibility is nil.
If anything, he is more Western, in a conservative sense, than most contemporary European leaders whose grounding in Western values can best be described as post-modern.
First, to be clear, I'm well aware that liberals tend to define the "mores and values" of Western civilization as their own, which are largely perpetually revolutionary. Which I and others disagree with.
Contemporary European Leaders are Post WWII puppets of London and NYC. Their actions are not independent, and they are not representatives of anything resembling traditional values. Their sole assigned project has been the USSR replacement state: the EU, as well as lending a hand in a continued march to recover central Asia.
Obama was a socially Far Left rabble rouser. His DOJ's anti police action alone firmly places him outside of tradition, let alone the rest of his social justice warrior actions. Sorry, a large contingent of the West doesn't accept its redefinition within a Neo-Marxist framework. If you think otherwise, I'm not the one with nil credibility.
Sweden will probably have less Whites than France due to their massive immigration... France is ~85-88% White, and not decreasing fast .. compared to Sweden which lets in 30k immigrants a year that are non white... I wouldnt be surprised if Sweden iss the first majority minority European country
At this rate Sweden could become a minority majority country before the U.S. Also to the people talking about how bad Canada is, frankly I disagree. Most immigrants in Canada are east Asians, Indians and Nigerians who are skilled or at least have a desire to get an education. Welfare immigrants are definitely the minority in Canada as opposed to Sweden where most recent immigrants are on welfare and many are unemployed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
.... 
