Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All the more reason to keep weapons from man--since they are only used for evil purposes, to harm or kill another.
Since you like the ancedotal, I own several firearms and keep a loaded revolver in the house.
I do not hunt, nor have I ever shot anyone.
Collectors, range/competition shooters, and reenactors are examples of gun owners who do not use them to "harm or kill another" or for "evil purposes".
Gun laws only effect law abiding citizens, criminals, by definition, ignore gun control laws. This type of legislation is a waste of tax revenue and law enforcement resources.
Also, no one is forced to won firearms in this country. If you do not agree with the 2nd Amendment, don't own a firearm, problem solved.
The elderly and infirm are not optimal. Nature would eliminate the weakiest amongst us. Natural law is the only sort that should be followed.
You are a social Darwinist.
By your logic, we should stop cleaning water, creating vaccines, antibiotics, grow food on a large scale, destroy our houses, and let any infection take its course.
We should return back to the stone age, without the tools. Because tools by your definition equals "unnatural".
I feel sorry for everyone who has to live near you.
We should let nature take its course--the strong will survive.
You are a sick man.
I for one care about people around me. I would help them rather then let "nature take its course".
You would be dead if we let nature take it's course. Probably killed by disease and/or famine.
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change".
Your idea's of natural selection, evolution, are wrong.
What makes them wrong? Those who adapt to disease, have a healthy immune system, fight only for their own survival (and not someone else's) are the ones who should and do survive. Of course, we all die at some point, but so what? It's not like any one life really matters to anyone else.
What makes them wrong? Those who adapt to disease, have a healthy immune system, fight only for their own survival (and not someone else's) are the ones who should and do survive. Of course, we all die at some point, but so what? It's not like any one life really matters to anyone else.
Tools are "nice to have"...but not everyone has them, or can get them. But they can adapt to working without them.
If this computer was gone tomorrow, I wouldn't be bothered. Would you? Do you rely on things? I don't rely on anything but myself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
