Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
 [Register]
Greenville - Spartanburg area Greenville - Spartanburg - Simpsonville - Greer - Easley - Taylors - Mauldin - Duncan
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-22-2019, 07:40 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,334,337 times
Reputation: 14004

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jandrew5 View Post
I know that, I have to take that route all the time. I hate it (and the portion in Georgia), especially considering that I-75 in middle of nowhere Georgia is 6 and even 8 lanes. The largest city on the whole stretch is Macon, and Macon isn't large. The biggest issue is obviously rebuilding 4 bridges across Hartwell Lake, but still. It's 19 miles of road work, out of 106 miles of road. With the right push for funds it could be done.
It will be interesting to see after GDOT widens I-85 up to US-129 (supposedly it will be finished in 2023) how aggressive they are with continuing the widening to the lake. I think there will still be about 41 miles left to widen of I-85 in Georgia from US-129 to the lake.

Who knows, it might be ten years after 2023 (or longer) before they decide to continue their push northeast with the widening?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2019, 08:02 PM
 
Location: TPA
6,476 posts, read 6,449,563 times
Reputation: 4863
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
It will be interesting to see after GDOT widens I-85 up to US-129 (supposedly it will be finished in 2023) how aggressive they are with continuing the widening to the lake. I think there will still be about 41 miles left to widen of I-85 in Georgia from US-129 to the lake.

Who knows, it might be ten years after 2023 (or longer) before they decide to continue their push northeast with the widening?
I just don't understand why SC and GA just don't get it over with. GA just gave 85 in metro Atlanta new toll lanes and is currently widening another 14 miles up to Braselton. Just go ahead and bring it on home (or at least to Commerce). You're right, after SC is done with the top half, who knows when someone will say "so, what about the bottom?"

I think both states should try to get joint funding and knock it out, especially with the truck traffic, which is the biggest issue imo. You're cramming so many trucks between Atlanta and Spartanburg with all the logistics and manufacturing. Atlanta is a truckers nightmare.

It just baffles me that neither state can do anything about it, yet Unadilla, Georgia, population 1,700, has 8 lanes on I-75:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.2547...7i13312!8i6656 .

And this section just outside Macon reaches 10:
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.7505...7i13312!8i6656

There's also some random lighting too. So curious how they got the money for all that and yet couldn't put any of on 85.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 08:26 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,334,337 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jandrew5 View Post
I think both states should try to get joint funding and knock it out, especially with the truck traffic, which is the biggest issue imo. You're cramming so many trucks between Atlanta and Spartanburg with all the logistics and manufacturing. Atlanta is a truckers nightmare.
GDOT and SCDOT are working together, but it's not on I-85, it's down on I-20 with replacing the old bridges over the Savannah River and Augusta Canal.

I-20 @ Savannah River Bridge Replacements

Georgia DOT and South Carolina DOT are replacing and widening the existing I-20 bridges over the Augusta Canal and Savannah River within the city of Augusta, Richmond County, Georgia and the city of North Augusta, Aiken County, South Carolina. The project replaces the existing bridges with new structures to improve safety and operations along I-20.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2019, 06:18 AM
 
7,259 posts, read 4,629,838 times
Reputation: 2105
https://twitter.com/scdotpress/statu...96316757766144
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2019, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Upstate
9,501 posts, read 9,818,992 times
Reputation: 8899
Quote:
Originally Posted by easymacbb View Post
Anyone else noticed that since the 385 bottleneck at 385/85 has broken, traffic instead is backing up off the exits towards Simpsonville?

Every night at rush hour, traffic flows smoothly unless you try to get off at West Georgia, Fairview or Harrison Bridge.

Before it was hit or miss for backing up, but now it's commonplace to come to a complete stop in the right lane because traffic is backed into the interstate at the exits.

Seems it's the law of unintended consequences. Somehow I felt safer needing to stop at the split everyday since everyone else had to stop, as opposed to waiting on the interstate to exit while cars fly by doing 80.
Drivers coming off that exit and turning right onto W. Georgia don't seem to understand that a YIELD sign doesn't give them the right to drive right out in front of thru traffic on W. Georgia. They are supposed to be ready to stop if necessary. Way too many close calls there because I-385 drivers are impatient. Sorry about the backup on the exit ramp, but it's not the fault of the drivers already on W. Georgia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
11,706 posts, read 24,791,036 times
Reputation: 3449
I wish the bridges here would of had a better architectural design like you see with the SuperRedTan interchange in Phoenix: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperRedTan_Interchange
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:13 AM
 
308 posts, read 270,231 times
Reputation: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
I wish the bridges here would of had a better architectural design like you see with the SuperRedTan interchange in Phoenix: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperRedTan_Interchange
Are you referring to the design of the columns and decking or just the symmetry of that design? That's no different than most designs in Texas either, but as with many things out west they simply have the room (right of way) to get it done compared to the East.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 11:43 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
401 posts, read 379,338 times
Reputation: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
I wish the bridges here would of had a better architectural design like you see with the SuperRedTan interchange in Phoenix: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperRedTan_Interchange
Brown desert colors are commonly used on infrastructure projects in the Southwest. AZ and NV seem to use that color scheme on all their recent interchange construction. Check out the "Spaghetti Bowl" in Las Vegas. I couldn't find any recent pics which show the new desert color scheme and design but I've driven through it quite a few times. There's a new intersection near Reno, can't remember which, that is done in desert theme.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
11,706 posts, read 24,791,036 times
Reputation: 3449
Quote:
Originally Posted by AginGreer View Post
Are you referring to the design of the columns and decking or just the symmetry of that design? That's no different than most designs in Texas either, but as with many things out west they simply have the room (right of way) to get it done compared to the East.
I’m referring to the actual architectural elements of the columns and bridge not the overall design or color. You can see the columns and bridge here half way down the page: US 60 - 202 Super RedTan Interchange - Structural Grace Zoom in on the picture and you can really see the elements I am referring to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 01:23 PM
 
308 posts, read 270,231 times
Reputation: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-man430 View Post
I’m referring to the actual architectural elements of the columns and bridge not the overall design or color. You can see the columns and bridge here half way down the page: US 60 - 202 Super RedTan Interchange - Structural Grace Zoom in on the picture and you can really see the elements I am referring to.
I see what you mean. However, the powers that be weren't even willing to pay to have lighting put in on this project, much less any extra design work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina > Greenville - Spartanburg area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top