Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:14 PM
 
2,409 posts, read 3,041,798 times
Reputation: 2033

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
What a crock.

All these $250,000 earners are exactly the people who benefit from our inflationary monetary system. All these $250,000 earners are the ones who are benefitting from this "bailout" and this "quantitative easing".

The people who pay for it, are all the people who earn their wages in U.S. Dollars.

So take your advice to "worry less about what others are doing", and stick it where the sun doesn't shine. Our national financial system, including an equitable system of taxation, is absolutely my business as an american.

Most Americans have no clue how their fiat based monetary system works. The US dollar has lost 70% of its value due to the private Federal Reserve system printing money like crazy. And you're right it's the rich who have stock in all these banks and the WallStreet speculators who have made a killing from this monetary ponzi scheme. But instead of seeing our monetary system for what it is......everyone else needs to simply work harder and "make it".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:17 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20884
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCroozer View Post
So all liberals must be poor huh? Your paradigm diatribes are all too common in America these days. Everything is a left right center issue with people like you. Hey genius I'm a libertarian and I voted for Ron Paul. That doesn't mean I don't believe in economic justice and equality. A free and open market one in which true capitalism flourishes would provide that. An economy based on sound money and sound investments not a few filthy rich speculating the rest of us into poverty so that our taxes can bail them out. America isn't a capitalistic country otherwise AIG, GM and a host of other multinational corporations would have gone flat broke and bankrupt. If America was a capitalist country we wouldn't have a government that privatizes profits and socializes losses the way they do. I'm hardly envious and FAR FROM greedy. And my point regarding the rich was in response to others who would argue just the opposite.....that all middle class people are undereducated spendthrifts who don't work hard and want a piece of everyone else's pie.

Again, if you are not satisfied with your socio-econmic situation, stop blaming others you see as an "impediment" to your success and get to work. Class warfare is the refuge of the indolent that applies the soothing balm of dissociation from one's responsibility. This is a great tool for the socialists and appeals to the disgruntled and lazy as an excellent excuse for thier failures.

I am not suggesting that everyone who is middle class is lazy or uneducated- far from it. However, most of the middle class people I know are relatively happy with thier position in life and do not spend thier waking hours blaming others for thier position in life.

The US is the most open and free nation in the world. If it is one's objective to become rich, one certainly can in America. However, I think it is certainly a sad state of affairs when has as their life's objective to simply accumulate wealth. Wealth should be an artifact of hard work and a benefit of doing a job well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:19 PM
 
2,500 posts, read 2,930,053 times
Reputation: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCroozer View Post
No the point of the thread was to counter the claim that people making $250K cannot be considered "weathy' in America. You've managed to project your own situation into the argument therefore emotionally diluting the entire debate. You must be a woman.
Good, more name-calling.

I'm a man. And while I'm not your father, I'm the man your father should have been. Then you might not be so bitter and carry around such a worthless sense of entitlement.

Your original post was ALL emotional. All of your posts are ALL emotional. You want to decide what other people should make, what they should keep, and where they should live. When people respond with facts you call them names and pretend that everyone is getting all emotional with you.

Whatever state your life is in right now is your own responsibility. Fix it yourself if you want it to be better, because nobody has to take on the responsibility of fixing it for you. Asking the government to pick other peoples' pockets (because you want that money to trickle down to you whether you admit it or not) is a sure sign of someone who has no intention of being a productive person on their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:20 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,737,789 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCroozer View Post
Most Americans have no clue how their fiat based monetary system works. The US dollar has lost 70% of its value due to the private Federal Reserve system printing money like crazy. And you're right it's the rich who have stock in all these banks and the WallStreet speculators who have made a killing from this monetary ponzi scheme. But instead of seeing our monetary system for what it is......everyone else needs to simply work harder and "make it".

I agree, although technically a person's income is not a measure of how "wealthy" they are. Wealth and income are different. To illustrate this:

If you inherited prime developable land, for example, you've been making a KILLING for the past 20 years by sitting on your thumb. But if you contribute to society as an engineer, or a doctor, your income has lagged inflation over the past 20 years.

We have a system where the people who own assets get richer and richer, as we debase the dollar. If the economy was sound, I'd say sure, lower taxes. But the economy ISN'T sound, it is in a state where we are transferring wealth from the lower and middle classes, to the upper classes. As such, these people need to have their faces taxed off.

In any case, 2% of households in my area earn over $250,000 a year. I fail to see how the highest-earning 2% of the population could be considered the middle class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:21 PM
 
15,092 posts, read 8,636,857 times
Reputation: 7432
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCroozer View Post
So why don't you move? I'm supposed to feel sorry for you because you live in one of the most expensive areas in the country and want to give your kids and your family the perfect little life yet you whine because $250K isn't enough to satistfy all your wants and needs? LOL.....that is the society that America has become. Sorry but NYC is hardly representative of America. In fact it's a bubble. Most New Yorkers spend their whole lives living in that bubble. You should try getting out more.
Let me explain something to you .... you are promoting the financial slavery being slowly implemented across the board ... some areas are higher cost areas, and the associated incomes rise to effectively meet these costs .... some people are fortunate to have incomes that they can pick up and move to lower cost areas (such as you described your position) but that's rare. If everyone could do that .. they would ... and then that cheaper to live area you moved to would magically become very expensive, very quickly, as all of that new money moved in.

You apparently don't understand this cause and effect ... it's not the lowest income brackets that set the price points ... it's the highest ones that do .. forcing everyone under them to suffer those increases that really don't affect the wealthy at all. This is precisely why the wealth distribution is so lopsided, because you have to account for debt owned as well as assets owned ... the difference is the true measure of wealth, not simply the income.

If you are a business owner, and make a Million a year ... you might ... after calculating income versus debt find yourself in the $150K income range, as your margins might run 7-12% ... with any economic downturn (such that we are facing now) threatening to bankrupt you in 24 months or less.

The multi-Billion corporation however, can easily absorb a 15% or 20% decline by killing 20% of it's operating costs (Employees) placing all the pressure on that Million Dollar small business who will suffer the consequences of that increased unemployment.

Those with this attitude of "I got mine because I'm smart, and don't expect me to feel sorry for you because you aren't smart like me" just don't understand what shaky ground they are actually standing on as they preach such nonsense.

There are no Islands in the 99 % club ... the 1% club own all of them ... and the 99% are just paying rent. Some have fancier places than others ... some drink better Whiskey, and smoke better cigars ... but they are still renters ... living on someone else's Island.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
3,849 posts, read 3,753,125 times
Reputation: 1706
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYChistorygal View Post
250 is not wealthy, especially in a large city. It's a very comfortable living if you live within those means, don't try to keep up with others, and you could possibly BUILD wealth of you are good at investing and such. You certainly cannot compare 250 to Gates or Buffet types.

So no, 250 is not wealthy, not even rich.
I'd guess that whether or not $250k annual income is 'rich' or 'wealthy' would depend a lot on the financial status of the person looking at it. For example, my annual income right now is approx $17k and the highest annual income of my late husband was approx $55k. So, yeah, to me that $250k looks like a fortune. To someone making that amount or more and living such a lifestyle as to need every cent of it, then no, it wouldn't look like much at all. And I think that is the main problem with debating what makes a 'fortune' - everyone is looking at it from very different viewpoints and simply cannot see it from the other person's point of view at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
What a crock.

All these $250,000 earners are exactly the people who benefit from our inflationary monetary system. All these $250,000 earners are the ones who are benefitting from this "bailout" and this "quantitative easing".

.
again wrong...so you are asaying that a household where the wife is a workingclass teacher and the husband is a workingclass cop, just because they earned 250k they are the 'benefiters' of 'bailouts' and 'quanitative easing'

again. the people spewing this '250k is rich' garbage dont look at the big picture

even in NON high cost of living areas,,,are you going to say a teacher earning 60k and a cop earning 60k (household of 120k) is rich....what'snext....40k is rich
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:27 PM
 
2,409 posts, read 3,041,798 times
Reputation: 2033
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Again, if you are not satisfied with your socio-econmic situation, stop blaming others you see as an "impediment" to your success and get to work. Class warfare is the refuge of the indolent that applies the soothing balm of dissociation from one's responsibility. This is a great tool for the socialists and appeals to the disgruntled and lazy as an excellent excuse for thier failures.

I am not suggesting that everyone who is middle class is lazy or uneducated- far from it. However, most of the middle class people I know are relatively happy with thier position in life and do not spend thier waking hours blaming others for thier position in life.

The US is the most open and free nation in the world. If it is one's objective to become rich, one certainly can in America. However, I think it is certainly a sad state of affairs when has as their life's objective to simply accumulate wealth. Wealth should be an artifact of hard work and a benefit of doing a job well.
Are you SURE you really want to make that argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:27 PM
 
Location: OKC
5,421 posts, read 6,505,038 times
Reputation: 1775
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalCroozer View Post
The government steals from the middle class everyday to pay for the rich and to bail out banks and corporations. All together now..A I G ........
I see, two wrongs will make a right. We won't stop the money from bank bailouts, instead we'll just have them take money from other unrelated rich people. Ugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2010, 01:29 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,737,789 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
again wrong...so you are asaying that a household where the wife is a workingclass teacher and the husband is a workingclass cop, just because they earned 250k they are the 'benefiters' of 'bailouts' and 'quanitative easing'
why stop there?

what if they are a teacher and a cop who make $500 million per year?

Quote:
even in NON high cost of living areas,,,are you going to say a teacher earning 60k and a cop earning 60k (household of 120k) is rich....what'snext....40k is rich
what the hell? change the subject much?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top