Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
First raise them to be responsible adults instead of trying to be their friend and letting them do whatever they want. Second, if the kid gets in trouble in school or at home, don't stand up for the kid. Punish the kid and stick to the punishment. Don't take "I'm sorry" and then end the punishment. Be clear with the kid about birth control and how expensive a baby is and that it'll be on the kid to pay. If the kid gets pregnant and doesn't want the baby then adoption is a viable option.
I agree with you, in an ideal world this is how it would be, our world today is not ideal and you will have parents who won't parent like they are supposed to, so what do we do? Do we force these girls to have babies they are not able to care for and let the tax payers foot the bill for the next 18 yrs of the childs life?
I personally do not think abortion is right but I would never presume to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her body, IMO abortion is between a woman and her God, not a woman and the government.
If you didn't want a fetus you should have prevented it. YOU trying to force ME to pay to raise that child that YOU brought into this world is selfish, evil and arrogant. If you can't feed them stop breeding, it's just that simple.
I wouldn't expect you to pay to raise my child, I would not HAVE a child, I would abort. I never wanted children under any circumstances......and a birth control failure wouldn't change that. BC failure = abortion.
BTW, I have always had more than enough money to raise a child or two or three. Newsflash......some people just do not want children and do not want to subject themselves to a pregnancy just so there is an ample supply of newborns for adoption.
Newsflash......some people just do not want children and do not want to subject themselves to a pregnancy just so there is an ample supply of newborns for adoption.
Then they should have their uterus removed and save the tax payer the headache.
A heart, two legs, two arms that are not able to sustain life are just parts......not a baby.
Yes it is breathing if it is close to term. You think living things don't start to breathe until they are born? They are breathing embryonic fluid, but are still breathing and getting oxygen that way.
If it's kids getting pregnant make the parents responsible to pay for the unwanted pregnancy. I wouldn't be surprised to more parents keeping an eye on their teenagers if this was put into law.
yes it is breathing if it is close to term. You think living things don't start to breathe until they are born? They are breathing embryonic fluid, but are still breathing and getting oxygen that way.
If I chose to have an abortion, the tax payer would not have to pay for it.....so what is your problem?
FYI.....doctors will not remove a woman's uterus just because she asks them to.
In fact, doctors will not even sterilize a woman unless she is over 30.
Knowledge is awesome.
Knowledge is awesome, we are talking about using PUBLIC money here.
FYI, send them over here then, a swift kick in the mid section ought to do it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
