Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-30-2012, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Denver, Colorado U.S.A.
14,164 posts, read 27,235,056 times
Reputation: 10428

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Improper lane usage and careless/reckless driving laws within the individual states already cover those scenarios.
You sound law happy
.
Maybe we should do away with DUI laws as well. I'm sure plenty of people drive drunk and happen to stay in their lane all the way home
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2012, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,017,688 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Let see we are ONE Nation, so YES we should have one set of driving laws for all states in the Nation, logic is your friend.
They had no right to break away, if you did your homework you would know that.
Actually nothing in the Constitution prohibited the Confederate states from seceding - one might even argue that Lincoln's actions to prevent them were illegal. Lincoln understandably wanted to preserve the Union and prosecuted a war to that effect - but that doesn't mean that the secesion was neccesarily unlawful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2012, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,944,857 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
We are a union of soveriegn states who cede certain enumerated powers to a federal government that are better handled at that level rather then by the states. The U.S. Constitution lists what those federal powers are and the 1oth Amendment makes it clear that all other powers "are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

You may be dismayed that this arrangement results in different laws among the states - and that is fine. If you wish to change this, then petition your state legislature to ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to that effect. Unless an amendment is passed that repeals or modifies the 10th Amendment - any federal ban on cell phone use while driving will be unconstitutional.
No reason at all to go to those lengths, all the federal government has to do is cut off federal highway funding. It was the same with speed limits and guess who won, clue it was not the States.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2012, 02:38 PM
 
45,231 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24989
Quote:
Originally Posted by denverian View Post
Maybe we should do away with DUI laws as well. I'm sure plenty of people drive drunk and happen to stay in their lane all the way home
Drunk drivers get found out and cited when they do something like drive erratically or go outside their lane. There is a pretense in their driving behaviour to pull them over.
If a cell phone talker ( reader, make up applier, nose picker, etc.) drives in the same unsafe manner as a drunk, they can be cited for improper lane usage or careless driving etc. under existing state laws.

The law happy control freaks want to ticket someone just because they might do something
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2012, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,017,688 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
No reason at all to go to those lengths, all the federal government has to do is cut off federal highway funding. It was the same with speed limits and guess who won, clue it was not the States.
There will be states that will refuse federal funds - already is happening - so an amendment will ultimately be the only way to gain full nationwide uniformity - unless you can convince the Supreme Court to invent something like a "right to privacy" as they did in Roe v. Wade and overrule the states power to make their own laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top