Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-22-2012, 08:14 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,221,262 times
Reputation: 55008

Advertisements

We should be allowed to carry the same weapons our local Police Department utilizes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2012, 08:29 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,600,924 times
Reputation: 16439
I probably won't add much after 800 responses, but I would just like to re-point out that the second amendment had nothing to do with individual self-defense nor hunting. The second amendment was about protecting the people against an attack by government forces (either invading forces or their own government that grew out of control). So for the purpose of the second amendment, yes, you do need an "assault rifle" capable of inflicting maximum damage. The only debate here should whether the second amendment is still needed and whether that threat still really exists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 08:34 AM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,618,468 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
If that is so....then where the hell were you last Friday in Newtown, CT. Now we have 26 dead, 20 6-7 year old defenseless kids!!
We were elsewhere, and obeying the "gun free zone" rules. Too bad, had there been a good guy with a gun, perhaps it wouldn't have been as bad. But "the authorities" made sure the bad guy was the only one who was armed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 04:13 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,946,946 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
I probably won't add much after 800 responses, but I would just like to re-point out that the second amendment had nothing to do with individual self-defense nor hunting. The second amendment was about protecting the people against an attack by government forces (either invading forces or their own government that grew out of control). So for the purpose of the second amendment, yes, you do need an "assault rifle" capable of inflicting maximum damage. The only debate here should whether the second amendment is still needed and whether that threat still really exists.
This is it plain and simple.. The American people seem to want change, IE: the 2 nd election of Obama. The first amendment trumps the second, but thats my opinion. What it all comes down to is the Supreme Court.Its not too late for changes coming from that direction. Whether you like it or not the Courts have become Political, thats not how it was supposed to be.
The other thing is all these "gun freedoms" were not always like they are today. Most of us grew up under much stricture gun laws, National, State, Local. The NRA had a lot to do with the changes in gun laws. Good or bad, thats how it is today. There is , I believe the average gun owner ( probably a card carrying NRA member ) does not share as radical an opinion as the Controllers of the NRA. Wayne Laf. wants to keep his 4 million dollar salary.. Don't be fooled buy anyone saying that our laws can not be changed again, back to where they were, they can ! Your right to own a gun will always be a social issue, a heated one." They are coming for my guns" crap will not happen. What will is there will be some middle ground , debates, and compromise. You just don't kill 6-7 year old kids, 20 of them some with 11 rounds of .223 ammo in them, or threw them.I can imagine what the crime seen looked like. If you are a gun " Guy" you know too. Take in Christmas in a small CT city and you have an explosive mix. Mark my words, there will be changes coming, whether you like it or not, thats just how it is. As far as that wing nut from the NRA, if you listened to his speech, this guy is delusional at best..We all must work together in order to present a fair and balanced approach instead of fighting tooth and nail, from both sides,.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 04:38 PM
 
Location: Earth
4,505 posts, read 6,485,829 times
Reputation: 4962
^^^^ As painful as it is to read your un-edjumacated meanderings...I did it....and I ask?


WTF are you talking about?

Did you even graduate yet?

The Constitution spells out the Second Amendment meaning individual rights and that's been upheld.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 06:28 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,207,835 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by darstar View Post
This is it plain and simple.. The American people seem to want change, IE: the 2 nd election of Obama. The first amendment trumps the second, but thats my opinion. What it all comes down to is the Supreme Court.Its not too late for changes coming from that direction. Whether you like it or not the Courts have become Political, thats not how it was supposed to be.
The other thing is all these "gun freedoms" were not always like they are today. Most of us grew up under much stricture gun laws, National, State, Local. The NRA had a lot to do with the changes in gun laws. Good or bad, thats how it is today. There is , I believe the average gun owner ( probably a card carrying NRA member ) does not share as radical an opinion as the Controllers of the NRA. Wayne Laf. wants to keep his 4 million dollar salary.. Don't be fooled buy anyone saying that our laws can not be changed again, back to where they were, they can ! Your right to own a gun will always be a social issue, a heated one." They are coming for my guns" crap will not happen. What will is there will be some middle ground , debates, and compromise. You just don't kill 6-7 year old kids, 20 of them some with 11 rounds of .223 ammo in them, or threw them.I can imagine what the crime seen looked like. If you are a gun " Guy" you know too. Take in Christmas in a small CT city and you have an explosive mix. Mark my words, there will be changes coming, whether you like it or not, thats just how it is. As far as that wing nut from the NRA, if you listened to his speech, this guy is delusional at best..We all must work together in order to present a fair and balanced approach instead of fighting tooth and nail, from both sides,.


the 2nd Amendment and the Constituion had nothing to do with obama getting elected again. if it did then he would be your dear leader for life and you would never vote again. but in 4 years pbo will be gone just as other presidnts have.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 09:14 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,946,946 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyborgt800 View Post
^^^^ As painful as it is to read your un-edjumacated meanderings...I did it....and I ask?


WTF are you talking about?

Did you even graduate yet?

The Constitution spells out the Second Amendment meaning individual rights and that's been upheld.
There you go again, being a JERK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 09:28 PM
 
1,148 posts, read 1,683,829 times
Reputation: 1327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Many reasons.

Self defense, Hobby collector, etc... and more importantly, because they want to and it is none of your damn business.

Now if you want to take issue with someone who owns one, then do so based on evidtential merit. If that person has not used such for any purpose against another, then you are attempting to divine what they will do, you are infringing on their liberty to live their life because you think your opinon is worth more than pouring urine out of a boot.

So I ask you, tell me why it matters if someone owns one and then justify why a lawful and good person should not? Go ahead, do so using evidential means and factual effect. Show us how you "know" someone who does own one is directly endangering another.

You can't, which makes you nothing more than a busy body demanding others live their lives as you see fit. It makes you a tyrant, someone who disrespects the liberty of another because they think they should be able to dictate to others as they see fit.
Exactly. Just because a person has a gun, doesn't make them a criminal. Funny how the left cries about law-abiding citizens protecting themselves, but are totally silent about the thousands of assault rifles being brought into this country by illegal immigrants and drug cartels. They want an open border, but want no guns for law abiding citizens. Well, much of the gun violence is happening along the border because we fail to secure it. I guess law abiding citizens are supposed to give up their rights while it is okay for drug cartels and illegal immigrants to carry assault rifles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 09:29 PM
 
Location: State of Superior
8,733 posts, read 15,946,946 times
Reputation: 2869
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
the 2nd Amendment and the Constituion had nothing to do with obama getting elected again. if it did then he would be your dear leader for life and you would never vote again. but in 4 years pbo will be gone just as other presidnts have.
It's not rocket science monkey. Put aside your closed cool aid mind for a min.The people have spoken, they want something done with all the killings by firearms. What is it you do not understand? Do you have any feelings at all, guess not. Some of you guys make me sick, I wonder what makes you tick.?, both of you.
Now after I got that out, listen up, Obama is now a lame duck president, he can do whatever he wants and not worry about re election. What makes you think I would want Obama to serve a third term. ? Only been done once FDR. The Constitution you guys hide behind, has lots of facets. The Courts have ruled differently over time. I guess do not remember how restrictive gun laws were years back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2012, 09:40 PM
 
27,159 posts, read 15,334,701 times
Reputation: 12079
"No true law abiding citizen would want to own an assualt weapon"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
I guess if you say so lol


That's all it's based on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top