Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:25 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,776,811 times
Reputation: 6856

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
It is split 50/50 and they don't lay off the guys in the military.
The total effect of the spending cuts from the Budget Control Act will be 2.14 million.

http://www.aia-aerospace.org/assets/...nal_Report.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,422,794 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
The total effect of the spending cuts from the Budget Control Act will be 2.14 million.

http://www.aia-aerospace.org/assets/...nal_Report.pdf
Wait. In one thread you want military spending cut and in this thread a cut in the projected increase (still a net increase) will add 1.5% to the UE rate.

The total cuts are less than $100 billion. You added $1 trillion in deficit spending and the UE rate increased.

I'm sorry if I don't believe any numbers I see out there - none make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:42 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,776,811 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Wait. In one thread you want military spending cut and in this thread a cut in the projected increase (still a net increase) will add 1.5% to the UE rate.

The total cuts are less than $100 billion. You added $1 trillion in deficit spending and the UE rate increased.

I'm sorry if I don't believe any numbers I see out there - none make sense.
Which thread was that?

When did I add a trillion in deficit spending?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,422,794 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Which thread was that?

When did I add a trillion in deficit spending?
You as a collective party.

The deficit jumped to $1.4 trillion in 2009. It has been over a trillion every year since Obama took office. It was $161 billion in 2007.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:20 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
You think 8% unemployment is bad, but you are fine with the sequester pushing unemployment up to 9%?
Then start making Drama Obama act like a grown up and tell him to cut spending in a more reasonable manner.

All Obama wants is to increase taxes AGAIN and he does not care how he does it or who to. Just remember, the next time he may consider you rich. He is NOT going to stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:22 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
But 8% unemployment for 4 years is just fine with him. What a joke.
Didn't he say he was going to veto any legislation that tried to stop sequestration? Now he did a flip flop and playing fear mongering. And worse yet there is the STUPIDITY among us that would love to crawl up his azz and will believe him.

Drama Obama at his finest.

People,... get this, YOU AINT GETTING ANY MORE FREE MONEY THAN YOU ALREADY GET. And if you are middle class, you aint getting any free money. You are the slaves that will continue supporting the democratic drones who think they are going to get more free stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:25 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,827,388 times
Reputation: 6509
So your saying Obama is trying to deceive you? Color me shocked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:27 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
So your saying Obama is trying to deceive you? Color me shocked.
lol, he's been deceiving the stupid all along. Color them stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:28 PM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,134,063 times
Reputation: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post


"This is what the president is saying is a massive and devastating spending "cut."" Rand Paul.

Listening to Obama, you would think there really would be spending cuts rather than a miniscule reduction in the spending increases. But to the worlds biggest spender, a slowing of the increase must be quite stressful.

The joker in the White House is saying a 1% cut will "add hundreds of thousands of Americans to the unemployment rolls. ... The unemployment rate might tick up again."

But 8% unemployment for 4 years is just fine with him. What a joke.

its not liberal at all....its more like an ole fashioned stern religion with commandments and fear

Last edited by stargazzer; 02-25-2013 at 10:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 10:29 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,017,439 times
Reputation: 5455
Did you say lies? His entrie presidency is one big lie. Here is yet another example......

If you want a thorough agency-by-agency rundown of the budget cuts sequestration would deliver, the Office of Management and Budget has you covered. In compliance with The Sequestration Transparency Act of 2012, the OMB sent a detailed report to Congress in September 2012. But there’s a small problem with the report: One of the cuts it warns against would affect an agency that no longer exists–and didn’t exist when the OMB sent its report to congress.
The first line item on page 121 of the OMB’s September 2012 report says that under sequestration the National Drug Intelligence Center would lose $2 million of its $20 million budget. While that’s slightly more than 8.2 percent (rounding error or scare tactic?), the bigger problem is that the National Drug Intelligence Center shuttered its doors on June 15, 2012–three months before the OMB issued its report to Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top