Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Somehow I have a sneaking feeling that Obama is about to make the Repubs look real foolish ... again. It will be interesting to hear what Kerry has to say today.
Based on the Rose Garden announcement today, could these have been some prophetic words?
When Bush supported military action against Iraq, they had been using chemical weapons against their own citizens, and he got approval from Congress before he took action. Support was unilateral.
Pelosi however DID vote against it. My question is, why would she approve of it now?
Most likely, it's because Hussein was not using chemical weapons against anyone at the time GWB decided to invade Iraq, nor did he have any known capability to do so, despite your claim. Whereas it seems pretty clear at this point that Assad is targeting civilians with chemical (and incendiary) weapons, and Obama is not asking for a poorly-manned, illl-considered ground invasion.
Or in other words, the OP did not show anything like a "stunning" reversal.
And, I guess warmongering Pubs have evolved too - because if one of their own were in the White house, we'd be bombing first and asking questions later. AND they would be all for it.
Amazing how positions change depending on who occupies the big white house, isn't it?
And, I guess warmongering Pubs have evolved too - because if one of their own were in the White house, we'd be bombing first and asking questions later. AND they would be all for it.
Amazing how positions change depending on who occupies the big white house, isn't it?
Pretty funny how this proves that republicans and democrats are absolutely no different, they just like the idea of political "teams".
And, I guess warmongering Pubs have evolved too - because if one of their own were in the White house, we'd be bombing first and asking questions later. AND they would be all for it.
Amazing how positions change depending on who occupies the big white house, isn't it?
Did Bush have other world super powers implying that WWIII would be imminent if he took action in Iraq?
See, it IS all about the party.
If you are a D then whatever a D wants is right.
If you are an R then whatever an R wants is right.
It's not about issues or people or any of that.
It's all about the party and when your party is in control whatever they want to do is right.
And its all part of the plan.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
