Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They not selected; their promoted which is the way the system had always been with candidates. Then then face off in a general election. you can run even if not nominated by a party if you can get the support. THEY are always someone never remember because THEY were full of BS.
You are right, what a difference a D makes. If Romney was in office, all the R's would be supporting a military invasion right now instead of questioning it.
When Bush supported military action against Iraq, they had been using chemical weapons against their own citizens, and he got approval from Congress before he took action. Support was unilateral.
Pelosi however DID vote against it. My question is, why would she approve of it now?
He got approval to invade a nation not to just drop a few bombs. Big big difference. Which is why dropping the bombs on Lybia didn't need congressional approval. And by the way, all republicans agreed but only a few democrats agreed but unfortunately it was enough.
Personally, I hope we don't do anything but I think Obama is backing himself into a corner especially since Britain has backed away.
I feel if we do launch missiles, things are gonna turn ugly very quickly.
You are right, what a difference a D makes. If Romney was in office, all the R's would be supporting a military invasion right now instead of questioning it.
The moonbat brain trust strikes again. Conservatives pushed for Bush to get congressional approval as well as when Clinton, who coincidentally let Bin Laden live, wanted to rain missiles. You guys need to read up on history before you post.
They live in a world all their own don't they. You can teach them all day but if they are not willing to learn your talking to yourself. I appreciate your effort though.
Last edited by Crossfire600; 08-30-2013 at 10:45 PM..
The difference is that President Bush was a credible leader who was surrounded by legitmate advisors who had years of experience.
.
Hahahaha, what a funny statement.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
