Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-17-2014, 06:14 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,651,295 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it's not. And you've been told so:
Um, yes it is. The comment I refer to is from the OP.

 
Old 11-17-2014, 06:53 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,049 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Um, yes it is.
No, it isn't. You've been given several examples proving it isn't.
 
Old 11-17-2014, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,651,295 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it isn't. You've been given several examples proving it isn't.
Whatever you say man. I checked again, and it's there. What you choose to believe, or not believe is of no interest to me.
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:05 AM
 
109 posts, read 91,052 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by carolac View Post
Dems paid Gruber $400,000 for his part in Obamacare. That's a whole lot of money to pay for stupid.

LMAO!

I love this.
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:17 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,564 posts, read 17,237,701 times
Reputation: 17609
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Coming apart at the seams? That's a bit dramatic, surely? Jonathan Gruber is an economics professor and policy consultant for hire--he's not exactly a big wheel in Democratic politics.

In any case, it's pretty much a truism at this point that both parties commonly rely on the stupidity of the public to do all sorts of things they'd never get away with in a country with more educated electorate.
Failure at making gruber videos an equivalent. While marketing goes on in both parties, gruber is seen as an ivory tower elitist academic, characteristic of the obama administration.

How do you explain Pelosi saying she never heard of gruber when there is a video of her introducing gruber. Does that not disturb you. Does it not make you wonder with people of Pelosi's ethics, and competence in charge of your health care, if you have placed your faith in the hands of the incpompetent?

How does it make you feel when obama's medical ethiscist, Ezechial Emanual, said, what the president meant when he said, 'you can keep your doctor,PERIOD!', is 'you can keep your doctor if you can afford yo keep your doctor'.

The fees gruber has collected from the obama admin is now in the $$4 mill neighborhood.

Gruber was in the several meeting in the oval office.

Gruber had a page devoted to him in the obamacare website.

Obama feigned knowledge of Gruber trying to suggest he was one of many and f no significance. Does that denial give you pause to wonder if your faith in Obamacare is misplaced?
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:20 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,049 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Whatever you say man. I checked again, and it's there.
I'm referring to your assertion that insurance works as Gruber described. It doesn't, and you've been given several examples proving such. And that's exactly why states had high risk insurance pools long before the ACA.
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:23 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,510,171 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Whatever you say man. I checked again, and it's there. What you choose to believe, or not believe is of no interest to me.
He said lack of transparency was critical for passage. If you made it clear that people with cancer, diabetes, AIDS, heart disease, etc., could buy a health insurance policy and not pay a penny more in premiums than a healthy person, the votes in Congress wouldn't have been there.
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,651,295 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
He said lack of transparency was critical for passage. If you made it clear that people with cancer, diabetes, AIDS, heart disease, etc., could buy a health insurance policy and not pay a penny more in premiums than a healthy person, the votes in Congress wouldn't have been there.
Pre-existing conditions? That was one of the most often repeated selling points. What makes you say people had no knowledge about it? Yes, the healthy pay for the sick. That's the whole thing in a nutshell, and contrary to Gruber's' comment that was actually was the selling point. Get the young and the healthy to sign up through the mandate, and then you'd have a larger pool of payers. You never heard them say that?

Last edited by Finn_Jarber; 11-17-2014 at 07:45 AM..
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:42 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,333,807 times
Reputation: 8066
Merged thread...deleted response

Last edited by Dockside; 11-17-2014 at 08:44 AM..
 
Old 11-17-2014, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,651,295 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I'm referring to your assertion that insurance works as Gruber described. It doesn't, and you've been given several examples proving such. And that's exactly why states had high risk insurance pools long before the ACA.
He said:

"if you had a law which said healthy people are gonna pay in... If you made it explicit the healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed"

Healthy people pay in, and the sick get paid, even if you had preexisting conditions. That's how it was sold. Get the young and the healthy to sign up through the mandate, and then you'd have a larger pool of payers. You never heard them say that? Really?

Everyone knew that is how it would work because that's how insurance works. Even single payer system works like that. If you did not know, they you are one of the stupid people he was referring to. There are VERY FEW people who does not know this.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top