Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The poll question was misleading. If you wanted to talk about cops choking people, you should have said so.
Then added more factors. If I had known you were luring posters, I wouldn't have answered the poll.
If I were able to continue to subdue the perp without the hold and was authorized to make a decision I might release the hold and cuff the perp.
If an an onsite supervising officer gave me the order to place a hold on the perp to subdue I would wait for the supervisor's order to release the hold (so maybe the onsite supervisor is responsible but 'SHE' is 'BLACK').
Had I released the hold against orders I could have been written up for being insubordinate and for being a racist and for putting my colleagues and the public at large, at additional unnecessary risk.
Let's just charge the supervising officer with negligent homicide and let a grand jury go through the evidence again.
True which is why it makes sense to check vitals and call an emt. Let the trained medical professionals judge whether or not it is a hoax or if your suspect is in distress or actually dying.
Am I using an illegal choke or a perfectly legal head lock as taught in the police academy? I'm an EMT & we always say "if they can speak, they can breathe". The suspect in NYC died of a heart attack, not from choking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.