Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2015, 07:39 AM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,392,439 times
Reputation: 10259

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
There was no reason to ask for her name and date of birth and then call it in to dispatch for a background check.
It is an abuse of power to detain a pedestrian and call in for a background check when they are not suspected in any crime.

Her only embellishment was that they sounded their siren - but she had earbuds on an some sound made her turn around. The police concede they turned on their emergency lights.
Katzpaw, she broke the law.

There are laws here (I live in the area) against
impeding traffic
walking in the road (where there is a sidewalk)
jay walking.


The Chief of Police pointed out that she did in fact break the law by impeding traffic.

If you break the law, you will be asked for your identification and the police will run that.


To this particular case, they had the right to write her a citation for the violation. They did not. They were quite kind to the lady.

She in turn was not so kind in return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2015, 07:44 AM
 
20,462 posts, read 12,392,439 times
Reputation: 10259
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
again, while it is not illegal to walk in the street, as far as i know, it is illegal to impede traffic, even if it is one vehicle that you didnt see. second, the officers didnt tell her she couldnt run in the street, they actually told her that it is SAFER to run facing traffic, rather than have traffic behind her.

contrary to popular opinion these days, cops do a lot of things by procedure, regardless of skin color. now your two might agree with ms bland that this was a racial thing, but the reality is that it wasnt, if these cops were truly racist and doing it just to hassle her, they would probably have written her a ticket for impeding traffic instead of letting her go on her way.

agree....



some years ago, I had an elderly neighbor get lost. she couldn't find her home and she didn't speak English very well. I got her in my car and we drove around until we found where she lived (she was living with her daughter and was new to the area).

When we got there, there was a police officer at these peoples home because she had been reported missing.

The police officer came over to me and was very nice and very professional.... asked me a number of questions. asked me for my identification. ran my info.

I am a white guy living in a white suburb in TEXAS. The police officer was very professional and was doing his job. I was also very polite and we had a nice conversation.

Police do what they do because as you point out procedure dictates what they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 10:31 AM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,277,731 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw
Allegedly the cops saw a truck almost hit her - but the video starts after this alleged incident when the cops are far behind her.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elle2015 View Post
That should be noted by the officials because it certainly would explain things. The fact that this info has not been widely reported on makes me question it's validity.
You must not have watched the video (same for those that claim the Officers didn't say anything about the sidewalk) - the video shows that the Officers DID tell her about the Truck and DID suggest that she walk on the sidewalk.

The Officers actually showed great restraint - it's against the Law in Texas to walk in the street when a sidewalk is available. It is also against the Law in Texas to walk with the Traffic, you are required by Law to walk against the Traffic - it's a State Law and I was made aware of it when walking to school down a road with no sidewalk back in the 1950's.

The Officers talked to her about Safety - neither one of them told her she was breaking 2 Laws.
Bland is an idiot out looking for problems - when a person is absolutely determined to search out/fabricate a grievance ..... they will usually be successful. She has no business being a Dean of anything, much less Journalism. She fabricated a news event as a "Dean of Journalism" and then she was proven wrong. She even managed to be judged "false" by SNOPES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 10:40 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,560,540 times
Reputation: 3602
She has to be damning those surveillance cameras that were supposed to back up her anti police claims so that she can make up whatever she desires.

dean of journalism? Kind of explains why the media is so worthless and biased.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 10:45 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,560,540 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salmonburgher View Post
Just watched the beginning of the video. I didn't see any racism. And the coppers were polite. And the prof. was polite.

BUT, I see no reason for the coppers to request the prof's. ID and name and dob. Just tell her that she should walk on the sidewalk as walking in the street is dangerous.
How about what the law requires to dispel the charge of walking while black? Which is what she wound up claiming. Bet she hates video tape now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 10:50 AM
 
13,305 posts, read 7,875,111 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salmonburgher View Post
Just tell her that she should walk on the sidewalk as walking in the street is dangerous.
How do you think she would have reacted to that fatherly advice?

Oh, so only blacks should walk on sidewalks?

Get on the sidewalk!

What are you going to do if I refuse?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,474,039 times
Reputation: 8599
Instead of speed traps Texas cops can rake it in fining people for walking on suburban streets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 11:00 AM
 
13,305 posts, read 7,875,111 times
Reputation: 2144
She was flapping her arms so as to be visually conspicuous to alert drivers behind her to cross into the oncoming lane to avoid hitting her.

When her arms stopped flapping, her gums started up with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 11:01 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,586,907 times
Reputation: 29291
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Instead of speed traps Texas cops can rake it in fining people for walking on suburban streets.
she wasn't fined or even cited, so there goes that bright idea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 11:10 AM
 
1,132 posts, read 1,247,727 times
Reputation: 2961
What's most disturbing to me is that Bland's "op-ed" in the Dallas Morning News involves multiple ethical and procedural violations of rules that are taught to first year journalism students.
She owes an apologiy to the police involved, a retraction to the readers of her story and most of all her resignation as Dean. UNT journalism students deserve better leadership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top