Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it existed previously, so of course medicaid and welfare would exist if it was repealed..
I'm not sure your point given no one suggested withdrawing a safety net from society.
And I thought conservatives wanted to decrease dependence on these programs. Repealing the ACA will increase dependence on Medicaid and welfare. At least those who can afford, must pay, what they can afford to, for their own insurance.
How does decreasing the ability to receive welfare, actually increase the dependency on welfare?
You arent making much sense..
You misunderstood. Taking away the ACA will decrease the number of people covered by insurance. These people without insurance will readily qualify for entitlement programs.
And I thought conservatives wanted to decrease dependence on these programs. Repealing the ACA will increase dependence on Medicaid and welfare. At least those who can afford, must pay, what they can afford to, for their own insurance.
Obamacare actually increased the dependency on Medicare.
You misunderstood. Taking away the ACA will decrease the number of people covered by insurance. These people without insurance will readily qualify for entitlement programs.
We still have 30 million uninsured americans, which is where we started..
You do understand that most of those who "benefited" from ACA actually ARE ON WELFARE/Medicaid, right?
You misunderstood. Taking away the ACA will decrease the number of people covered by insurance. These people without insurance will readily qualify for entitlement programs.
Also, there are those who would rather have totally free medical insurance (Medicaid) rather than pay what they can afford for health insurance (ACA).
We still have 30 million uninsured americans, which is where we started..
You do understand that most of those who "benefited" from ACA actually ARE ON WELFARE/Medicaid, right?
Why isn't the GOP working on this then? What are they proposing to help this?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
it existed previously, so of course medicaid and welfare would exist if it was repealed.. 
Repealing the ACA will increase dependence on Medicaid and welfare. At least those who can afford, must pay, what they can afford to, for their own insurance.