Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-24-2016, 11:42 PM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,287,846 times
Reputation: 668

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke_TX View Post
It started in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.




http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/us...ians.html?_r=0
That has already been addressed, it was local police acting with no authority to confiscate guns. It is no different than a local police officer blatantly murdering a person. Some cops are bad and abuse their powers, but no government agency ordered guns to be confiscated after Katrina.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2016, 12:55 AM
 
1,515 posts, read 1,226,123 times
Reputation: 1632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I know, I know, so who screens these people your neighbors.
The FBI, if they submit to the NICS background check. But that's the point - only the law-abiding are affected. The criminals won't be affected. They won't submit to a background check. It's already illegal for the buyers in your example to possess firearms. It's already illegal for anyone to sell them one. So they'll steal one or buy illegally or from the black market. If they have no qualms about murdering someone they sure as hell won't have a problem stealing a gun, etc. No new laws will affect them. The laws already on the books aren't being enforced like they should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 06:44 AM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,464,208 times
Reputation: 24994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
That has already been addressed, it was local police acting with no authority to confiscate guns. It is no different than a local police officer blatantly murdering a person. Some cops are bad and abuse their powers, but no government agency ordered guns to be confiscated after Katrina.
If they are local police, they have authority. Try refusing a request from a local police officer and see what that gets you.
And did I miss something, aren't local police pd's considered govt. agencies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Kentucky Bluegrass
28,901 posts, read 30,284,252 times
Reputation: 19146
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Could anybody help me to understand why people don't realize this? If we do a survey, over 90% of Americans would support background check.

"Gee, I can't buy a gun so I must do no killing!" Said by no one in the history of mankind!

If a person is so dangerous that we don't trust them with a firearm, why do we even let that person walk outside of prison or hospital?

Instead, we spend billions on background check while the bad guys are happily running around, raping and murdering people with and without guns.
sort of as stupid as the "Gun Free Zones" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 06:48 AM
 
2,464 posts, read 1,287,846 times
Reputation: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
If they are local police, they have authority. Try refusing a request from a local police officer and see what that gets you.
And did I miss something, aren't local police pd's considered govt. agencies?
So either you missed my point or you are pretending to not understand what I said, so you simply twist my words to what I didn't say.

A local officer doing something he shouldn't isn't the same as a local officer doing something he is ordered to do from a state or federal government.

No one ordered guns to be confiscated after Katrina, that was nothing more than some officers acting poorly and doing something they were not suppose to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 07:04 AM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,464,208 times
Reputation: 24994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
So either you missed my point or you are pretending to not understand what I said, so you simply twist my words to what I didn't say.

A local officer doing something he shouldn't isn't the same as a local officer doing something he is ordered to do from a state or federal government.

No one ordered guns to be confiscated after Katrina, that was nothing more than some officers acting poorly and doing something they were not suppose to do.
haha no.
a govt agent giving you an order is an edict and it matters little if it came from the individual officers or higher up the food chain. And you have no proof it didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 07:09 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,654,236 times
Reputation: 18521
Background checks are unconstitutional. The whole point of the 2nd amendment was so the public was better armed than government, for a reason. There is no way the founders wanted an eventually overbearing government, to know who had what weapon.

Funny how the 2nd Amendment wasn't challenged by government, until the end of the Civil War.... Now, why could that be? LOL! People are idiots, to ever let government be better armed than the people, if they ever wanted to maintain liberty for all..........

People secure liberty, not government set on controlling those that consent to be controlled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 07:44 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,576,036 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoByFour View Post
That is what we all want. The problem is new crazies and home grown terrorists pop up all the time. Charles Whitman was not on anyone's radar when he went nuts. Micah Johnson (the Dallas sniper) had no criminal record. Adam Lanzla (Sandy Hook killer) was a kid, a bit odd but not odd enough to be labeled insane.

We don't have a machine that can look into the mind of someone and say he/she is going to go nuts and start shooting people. The alternative most countries take is severely restrict access to guns which limits the carnage, but does not stop it.

We pay a high price in this country for the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms.
What high price are you talking about?

Alcohol kills almost 90,000 Americans each year not including murders, suicides and other violence it causes, and drinking alcohol has absolutely no use. With guns, at least we can argue there's self-defense against criminals and against a tyrannical government.

Somehow we need the 21st Amendment but not the 2nd?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 07:49 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,576,036 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliftonpdx View Post
So either you missed my point or you are pretending to not understand what I said, so you simply twist my words to what I didn't say.

A local officer doing something he shouldn't isn't the same as a local officer doing something he is ordered to do from a state or federal government.

No one ordered guns to be confiscated after Katrina, that was nothing more than some officers acting poorly and doing something they were not suppose to do.

Once again, why can't people be honest? I am so tired of hearing lies after lies.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critic...ilian_firearms
"Controversy arose over a September 8 city-wide order by New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass to local police, U.S. Army National Guard soldiers, and Deputy U.S. Marshals to confiscate all civilian-held firearms. .... Seizures were carried out without warrant, and in some cases with excessive force"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2016, 08:18 AM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,135,138 times
Reputation: 13096
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Once again, why can't people be honest? I am so tired of hearing lies after lies.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critic...ilian_firearms
"Controversy arose over a September 8 city-wide order by New Orleans Police Superintendent Eddie Compass to local police, U.S. Army National Guard soldiers, and Deputy U.S. Marshals to confiscate all civilian-held firearms. .... Seizures were carried out without warrant, and in some cases with excessive force"
And some of those people never recovered their illegally seized property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top