Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So for all the Trump detractors.....are you scared he can WIN?
I'm scared he can destroy this country and start WWIII and so should you.Remember it was the republicans that put him in there, there will be blood on their hands if he is elected.
You're the one laughing in denial. I'm dead serious out of concern for the self-deception that has driven you to blind yourself to what I've written to you.
You and Jim have both done everything a prototypical evader would do to avoid having to exhibit intellectual integrity. You posted a bunch of pronouncements, were challenged with regard to their veracity, challenged to provide objective evidence instead of your opinion that proof exists, and instead of doing so you try to ridicule someone who is holding you to account for your baseless claims. Jim similarly has yet to respond to the challenge to provide objective evidence of the claims he's made.
There is this notion called truth, within which if you say something you want people to believe, that you present objective evidence that is irrefutable, rather than just figuratively stamping your feet and petulantly insisting that you should be believed regardless of the fact that you just made it all up and have not presented any objective evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AADAD
So for all the Trump detractors.....are you scared he can WIN?
Absolutely. You exist. I don't deny you exist, like you deny truth.
That should give you a pretty good scale of the depth of corruption he has to confront. Back room deals on hotels compared to swapping intelligence secrets? C'mon; get real.
You're kidding, right?
Trump's organization had a server that only sent messages to two servers in Moscow. When it was discovered by computer scientists, Trump's server was shut down.
Roger Stone, his good buddy, brags about "back channel" communication with Assange with his Russian-hacked emails that are, strangely enough, only of Clinton's campaign.
Then, of course there are Russian operatives actually working on his campaign.
Forget the vague conspiracy theories with no evidence other than RWN delusional suspicions to back them up. There is a plethora of evidence that Trump's campaign is either working with or at the direction of Putin.
Wrong! The "law AS WRITTEN" outlines both the parameters of jurisprudence (which you've made clear you don't understand properly) and that of due process (which has been observed, and resulted in the opposite conclusion from the one you are trying to claim).
Jim: Do some investigation work:
1) What is the proof of the means of the crime you allege?
2) What is the proof of the motive of the crime you allege?
3) What is the proof of the opportunity of the crime you allege?
If you cannot provide all three sets of proof, unequivocal - in other words, not your "opinion of proof" but actual real objective evidence of proof - then you have failed Jurisprudence 101.
Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18)
Does it say anywhere in that statute anything about INTENT Mr. Mason?
Stop deflecting attention away from the fact that you're wrong. Ignorance of the basic principles of jurisprudence is no excuse for your error.
Means, motive, opportunity. Provide objective evidence of your proof of each of the three.
"Put up or shut up" time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.