Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:52 AM
 
6,617 posts, read 5,014,844 times
Reputation: 3689

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
If we evened out the trade deficit with Mexico they could build a wall to Bolivia and it wouldn't cost the US taxpayers a nickel. THAT is how you get Mexico to pay for the wall.
Please look up what a trade deficit means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:52 AM
 
1,302 posts, read 684,306 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Not really a shock to people with common sense, but this is a humiliating defeat after months of chest pounding and heated rhetoric for extremists who worship Trump.

For future reference, we dont have the authority to force a sovereign country to pay for anything. Welcome to the world.

Sources: Trump will ask Congress, not Mexico, to pay for border wall - CNNPolitics.com


This is fair, this is correct, I wouldn't disagree with this, most mexicans don't care about the Wall as long as US pays it. We are not building a Wall in our side to stop you, If we were we would have to pay it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:54 AM
 
1,302 posts, read 684,306 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro5 View Post
If we evened out the trade deficit with Mexico they could build a wall to Bolivia and it wouldn't cost the US taxpayers a nickel. THAT is how you get Mexico to pay for the wall.
Trump has already called Automakers to stop investing in México to put presure on us so we star paying the Wall. Not happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:56 AM
 
17,347 posts, read 11,293,931 times
Reputation: 41015
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob1094 View Post
your average trump supporter is a 50-70 year old white male with little education and has shown no interest in politics there entire life.

i guarantee they thought trump would get mexico the pay for the wall.
This post shows how truly ignorant you are of any facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,081 posts, read 51,252,674 times
Reputation: 28329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alonso_Castillo View Post
This is fair, this is correct, I wouldn't disagree with this, most mexicans don't care about the Wall as long as US pays it. We are not building a Wall in our side to stop you, If we were we would have to pay it.
That just seems so rational doesn't it? If we want a wall, we build it, we pay for it. So how in the world did so many Americans fall for Trump's ridiculous position that Mexico would pay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:57 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,284,785 times
Reputation: 14591
"Because the 2006 law included a floor on fencing miles, not a ceiling, and since it also allows the Department of Homeland Security to determine what kinds of structures to build, Capitol Hill Republicans believe Trump already has all the authority he needs to start construction of a wall. All they have to do is fund it."

'nuff said. Move on to next fake news.

House GOP, Trump team hatch border wall plan - POLITICO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:59 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,864,594 times
Reputation: 9284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
That just seems so rational doesn't it? If we want a wall, we build it, we pay for it. So how in the world did so many Americans fall for Trump's ridiculous position that Mexico would pay?
Because a dollar saved is a dollar earned... foreign concept for liberals...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:59 AM
 
Location: DFW
40,952 posts, read 49,213,992 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post

All I hear from the right is how bad the problem of illegal immigration is. It is impossible to build a wall in large areas of the border because land is privately owned. And a large percentage of people are here illegally because of overstaying visas, not because of crossing the US/Mexico border on foot.
Being in Long Island you may not see the affects of 30-60,000 Illegals crossing the border every month like we do along the border. The costs to our schools, hospitals, public services. It's a huge factor here in TX especially the crime committed by Illegals.

We've got to stop the flow first then we can decide on who stays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 06:59 AM
 
62,993 posts, read 29,170,163 times
Reputation: 18604
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
It speculates various reasons for the decrease in apprehensions, the wall potentially being one of them.


All I hear from the right is how bad the problem of illegal immigration is. It is impossible to build a wall in large areas of the border because land is privately owned. And a large percentage of people are here illegally because of overstaying visas, not because of crossing the US/Mexico border on foot.

You post a link to back up your claims and then you shoot it down because it doesn't fit your agenda? All we need are the 700 miles built on the most porous areas of our border already approved by congress. Only 40% of illegals are visa over stayers and we can implement a better system of tracking them. 60% of illegals are illegal border crossers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2017, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,284,785 times
Reputation: 14591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The 2006 bill authorized 600 miles, which was built. Obviously it is not working, or we would not be having this discussion.

Fake news again? 36 miles was built, not 600. You can't get away with lies here.

"Ultimately, only 36 miles of double-layer fencing was erected. U.S. Customs and Border Protection built roughly 350 miles of single-layer pedestrian fences, most which stand about 18 feet, and 300 miles of low-level vehicle barriers that any person could easily walk through, according to sources following the matter."

House GOP, Trump team hatch border wall plan - POLITICO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top