Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sounds more like "a support program for Deeps in the Sticks Southern, Rural and Back Woods incest"... I guess they want to make sure they have access to another generations of their self produced offspring's. heck, they probably have a measure included that give them unrestricted access to certain type of livestock as well. because its's quite likely bestiality is next on their considered options for the pleasure quest activities. I'm sure they will next be focused on shooting for the age of 9 as being the age of consent with covenants, that it must be a relative within no more than 1st or 2nd cousin range. because outside of second cousin, its all considered fair game...
How about forcing a man to be a father when he doesn't want to be?
Just ask any male single professional athlete the lengths they have to go to to avoid getting trapped for 18+ years of very expensive child support by lying, scheming, conniving women who say they're on the pill, their tubes are tied, their diaphragm is in, etc., etc., etc.
This cuts both ways. Don't pretend it doesn't.
They were "trapped" because the female didn't use birth control?.
No surprise that women are against something that evens the playing field regarding MEN being able to have some rights when it comes to children he does or does not want.
This is about a rapist, having rights over another person they have carried out a crime against.
The law, is forcing the "rights" of the criminal over the victim.
How about forcing a man to be a father when he doesn't want to be?
Well, when men incubate babies in their ball sacks and shoot them out their d*cks then they will be in charge of surgical decisions regarding said babies.
How about forcing a man to be a father when he doesn't want to be?
Just ask any male single professional athlete the lengths they have to go to to avoid getting trapped for 18+ years of very expensive child support by lying, scheming, conniving women who say they're on the pill, their tubes are tied, their diaphragm is in, etc., etc., etc.
This cuts both ways. Don't pretend it doesn't.
If athletes are so worried about women lying to them, guess what?....they have options other than believing a one night stand when she tells him "not to worry".
No wonder so many athletes make millions yet end up dead broke.....they aren't the sharpest tools in the shed, are they? LMAO
They were "trapped" because the female didn't use birth control?.
Cause God forbid men take some person responsibility and use some form of birth control as well.
Why would they not? Who knows what else she might be lying about, if the relationship isn't strong enough to trust that the woman is taking birth control, both parties should be doing whatever needs to be done to protect themselves.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm sure they will next be focused on shooting for the age of 9 as being the age of consent with covenants, that it must be a relative within no more than 1st or 2nd cousin range. because outside of second cousin, its all considered fair game...
