Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's sweet how you always manage to find the silver lining in anti-woman BS Republican laws.
It's not "a silver lining" it's also not running around with my ***** hat on fire.
If you read the legislation, the impact on spousal rape victims is infinitesimal in comparison to the screeching headline. In reality, this law is intended to give the father a say in the killing of his unborn child. THAT is the real impact, not the false red meat being thrown at the pro-abortion base.
It's not "a silver lining" it's also not running around with my ***** hat on fire.
If you read the legislation, the impact on spousal rape victims is infinitesimal in comparison to the screeching headline. In reality, this law is intended to give the father a say in the killing of his unborn child. THAT is the real impact, not the false red meat being thrown at the pro-abortion base.
The "father" in this case could be a man who is keeping his wife under his thumb who uses this as an excuse to further corral her, abuse her and possibly abuse his offspring. If this is ok with you, then you need to examine your moral compass.
If a woman gets raped; the attacker has NO rights, period. Too; if the victim wanted to play rough; have his ass locked up AND force the bum to pay child support.
Tho to be fair: I'm talking about forced rape where it CAN be proven it wasn't consensual sex.
So a husband can stop his wive from aborting their child, even in cases of spousal rape. And statistics show that 50% of spousal rape involves forced oral or anal sex, so that reduces the percentage by 50% and of those 50% of women raped by their spouse. Statistic show that pregnancy occurs as a result of rape in approximately 5% of all cases nationwide, so your misleadingly false headline focuses on the likely less than 1% if that many of cases where pregnancy is a result of spousal rape.
Your math and logic are not very good
First, citation for your statistics requested
Second (and related to the first), because a rape "involves" forced oral or anal rape [rape isn't sex] doesn't mean that vaginal rape didn't also occur.
Third, your poor use of language makes your transition from "5% of all cases nationwide" to "likely less than 1% if that many of cases" impossible to understand.
Try this again, and show your work.
Also, I'm curious about your stance on the "immigration ban"
Have you done the math on that one?
The "father" in this case could be a man who is keeping his wife under his thumb who uses this as an excuse to further corral her, abuse her and possibly abuse his offspring. If this is ok with you, then you need to examine your moral compass.
And the woman could be a sorry jerk who is just claiming rape but really wants to kill the baby because she is mad at her husband for taking her to McD's on her anniversary.
The only law lands that sanction the genocide of the unborn needs is if it really indeed is her body and her choice then she doesnt get a court to force a man to pay for her choice to not kill the baby.
I doubt that a man who is raping his wife would actually want her to have the child. Seems to me if a woman is being raped by her husband, she could file a divorce and do what she wants.
Right. Misleading headline, anyway. The headline is a hysterical, leftist attempt at building public outcry against this bill. In actuality, the bill allows husbands/fathers to sue their significant others from having abortions in the 2nd trimester. The "rapist" headline is being pushed in that the law doesn't explicitly prevent rapists from suing to prevent the abortions. But "rapists" will be incarcerated, not out paying bling to hire attorneys to save the life of the unborn.
So a husband can stop his wive from aborting their child, even in cases of spousal rape. And statistics show that 50% of spousal rape involves forced oral or anal sex, so that reduces the percentage by 50% and of those 50% of women raped by their spouse. Statistic show that pregnancy occurs as a result of rape in approximately 5% of all cases nationwide, so your misleadingly false headline focuses on the likely less than 1% if that many of cases where pregnancy is a result of spousal rape.
Further, the purpose for this legislation is to protect the father of unborn children from being denied his progeny in BASICALLY EVERY INSTANCE of pregnancy that resulted from consensual marital sex.
So no, this is not a reason to don your ***** hat and carry vagina signs.
Sorry, marriage does not make a woman the property of her husband.
A woman cannot be owned, we are not breeding stock.
A husband cannot make any other medical decisions for a wife against her wishes, abortion is no different, it is a medical decision that effects her health, he has no say.
So a husband can stop his wive from aborting their child, even in cases of spousal rape. And statistics show that 50% of spousal rape involves forced oral or anal sex, so that reduces the percentage by 50% and of those 50% of women raped by their spouse. Statistic show that pregnancy occurs as a result of rape in approximately 5% of all cases nationwide, so your misleadingly false headline focuses on the likely less than 1% if that many of cases where pregnancy is a result of spousal rape.
Further, the purpose for this legislation is to protect the father of unborn children from being denied his progeny in BASICALLY EVERY INSTANCE of pregnancy that resulted from consensual marital sex.
So no, this is not a reason to don your ***** hat and carry vagina signs.
Some serious mental gymnastics there, poster. I give you a 10/10 on the dismount.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
