Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They dealt with people who think like me just fine for thousands of years.
Nobody freaked out over Christine Jorgensen in the 1950s.
But men in dresses following little girls into the ladies' restroom is not something that anyone should expect would ever be accepted by a normal society.
Right, but if a man in a dress wants to follow little girls into a restroom, he's not going to let an anti-transgender law stop him. Show me one case where an actual transgender person has (not just a pervert in a dress) assaulted a female in a restroom. Just like a gun law will not prevent someone from shooting someone dead.
No more than before. Except it will cement the LGBTQ community not getting behind him.
That community isn't as cohesive as you might think. Some think the T SJWs are demanding too much too soon and are creating a backlash and loss of gains already made. There's resentment in the ranks.
Right, but if a man in a dress wants to follow little girls into a restroom, he's not going to let an anti-transgender law stop him. Show me one case where an actual transgender person has (not just a pervert in a dress) assaulted a female in a restroom. Just like a gun law will not prevent someone from shooting someone dead.
I'll ask the same question I asked in another thread...
A female employee in the women's locker/shower room is unwillingly exposed to the male genitalia of a self-declared trans in the women's locker/shower room. She files a workplace sexual intimidation/harassment charge. The anatomically male trans claims not being able to shower in the women's facilities is discrimination.
I'll ask the same question I asked in another thread...
A female employee in the women's locker/shower room is unwillingly exposed to the male genitalia of a self-declared trans in the women's locker/shower room. She files a workplace sexual intimidation/harassment charge. The anatomically male trans claims not being able to shower in the women's facilities is discrimination.
Whose rights prevail?
This is a good part of what it comes down to. Women are losing their private spaces to men. And so it appears-men's rights prevail. As usual.
I'll ask the same question I asked in another thread...
A female employee in the women's locker/shower room is unwillingly exposed to the male genitalia of a self-declared trans in the women's locker/shower room. She files a workplace sexual intimidation/harassment charge. The anatomically male trans claims not being able to shower in the women's facilities is discrimination.
Whose rights prevail?
Are they going through the process of the transition from male to female or is it just a man wearing a dress. Or what if it is a hermaphrodite that identifies as female? Your views are very much it is what it is and not considering the true circumstance. I get that the woman feels she was harassed but it wasn't intentional.
Are they going through the process of the transition from male to female or is it just a man wearing a dress.
A self-declared trans individual who has a penis and testicles.
So, again...
A female employee in the women's locker/shower room is unwillingly exposed to the male genitalia of a self-declared trans in the women's locker/shower room. She files a workplace sexual intimidation/harassment charge. The anatomically male self-declared trans claims not being able to shower in the women's facilities is discrimination.
Whose rights prevail?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.