Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,624,362 times
Reputation: 29385

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atalanta View Post
Clearly after Rubios questions, for sure the question asking why the only thing not leaked was Trump was NOT under investigation.
It was clear that Comeys intent was to make it look like Trump was or could be.

Comeys bias is loud and clear

He explained why he didn't make a public statement saying Trump wasn't under investigation. Did you miss that when you watched the hearing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:22 PM
 
7,276 posts, read 5,288,966 times
Reputation: 11477
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
You guys love to make it personal when you lose.

But there isn't a single photo of Trump at this house.
I just continue to read your unabashed love for Trump, that's all. It's blatantly evident. Not a personal attack whatsoever, just an idiotic observation based on nothing more than internet reading.

And I didn't lose. I didn't win either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:26 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,648,625 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
...Not a personal attack whatsoever,....
You lost the argument. Now you try to make it about me.

Time to put on those big boy pants and move on.

Trump won't be impeached.

Russians had nothing to do with Hillary's loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,624,362 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
One cannot be vindicated if not charged. And again criminal charges are not necessary for impeachment.

And the only real threat to Trump would be a Republican attempt to get him to resign or impeach him. Both appear very unlikely at this point.

That however will not prevent Trump sinking the Republicans in 2018. And no amount of irrational backings by the Trumpites will prevent that.

Vindicate

to clear (someone) of blame or suspicion

show or prove to be right, reasonable, or justified



You certainly can be vindicated of suspicion or blame while not being charged with anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:42 PM
 
16,956 posts, read 16,763,499 times
Reputation: 10408
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
Somehow I can picture your room with posters of Trump all over it, just like a teenager with their favorite popstar icons. Your love for Trump is spectacular.
But your room is not complete without a Trump Chia Pottery Plant. $19.99 at Walmart.


https://www.walmart.com/ip/Chia-Dona...&wl13=&veh=sem
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,360,489 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
You lost the argument. Now you try to make it about me.

Time to put on those big boy pants and move on.

Trump won't be impeached.

Russians had nothing to do with Hillary's loss.
You are simply speculating. There are any number of scenarios where Trump gets impeached or convinced to quit. Not likely at the moment but certain possible. Maybe even plausible.

There are rational reasons to believe Russia may well have played a role in the Clinton loss. The may be correct or wrong. They may have had a big impact or none. We simply don't know yet. And I personally believe it will lead to some very interesting discussions as we find out what is actually known.

But your confidence in both outcomes is pretty well absurd. We may know some more in a year or two...but for the moment all any of us has is opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,325,190 times
Reputation: 7624
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Opinions can be lies.

Fox News has convinced people that any old accusation is fine as it is your opinion. Free speech and all.
More like CNN has convinced people of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 03:49 PM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,648,625 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch View Post
There are rational reasons to believe Russia may well have played a role in the Clinton loss....
Please name them.

Specifically how did the Russians force the people here in the battle ground state of NC to vote for Trump?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,802,638 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Please name them.

Specifically how did the Russians force the people here in the battle ground state of NC to vote for Trump?
You wish to add the word force. As in placed a gun to the head to vote or not vote in a particular way.

Of course no one forced anyone.

However, it is still illegal to influence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2017, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Lone Mountain Las Vegas NV
18,058 posts, read 10,360,489 times
Reputation: 8828
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Please name them.

Specifically how did the Russians force the people here in the battle ground state of NC to vote for Trump?
The proposal is that the Russians may have leaked damaging documents from Democratic sources. Proven? Nah. Dis-proven? Nah. So we await real information. And they may have also declined to leak damaging documents from the Republicans. Proven? Nah Disproven? Nah.

So we see if their is any real evidence. We know something exists but not what.

My opinion is and remains that the loss of Clinton was caused by the Comey October memo. Just enough at the wrong time to move the critical vote in the rust belt the fraction of a percent that defeated Clinton.

That though does not say there was not Russian influence. Merely that it was not the deciding action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top