Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
He has said that he created records after conversations with Trump: https://youtu.be/2dl0QIN6a9Q?t=2m37s (2min 35 seconds for the answer to one question about that)
He lied or it would be on his gov. issue laptop, They don't keep their personal laptop in the car unless they have been fired and the gov. computer confiscated.... Exactly what the topic of this thread is.
They are an afterthought from a disgruntled employee. Kinda like screaming rape after consensual sex and getting dumped.
He lied or it would be on his gov. issue laptop, They don't keep their personal laptop in the car unless they have been fired and the gov. computer confiscated.... Exactly what the topic of this thread is.
You really have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to technology, maybe you should stay away from that area since you only end up looking foolish when you try.
He lied or it would be on his gov. issue laptop, They don't keep their personal laptop in the car unless they have been fired and the gov. computer confiscated.... Exactly what the topic of this thread is.
They are an afterthought from a disgruntled employee. Kinda like screaming rape after consensual sex and getting dumped.
How do you know they were not on his government-issued laptop? And even if they weren't, that doesn't mean they were not immediately written right after his meetings (as he said). Additionally, the material of his notes/memos were not (and are not) classified information.
Again - what is the source of your claims? Do you have one?
Trump was not charged with anything and therefore it is difficult to see how he can be vindicated. The obvious attempt to co-opt a major department head could easily be basis for impeachment. But the only ones who can possibly impeach Trump are the Republicans who appear to have no interest in doing so.
So Trump has been clearly identified as a liar and a person quite capable of corrupting the system. None of which damages anything other than perhaps Trump reputation.
All going toward a Republican disaster in 2018.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch
One cannot be vindicated if not charged. And again criminal charges are not necessary for impeachment.
And the only real threat to Trump would be a Republican attempt to get him to resign or impeach him. Both appear very unlikely at this point.
That however will not prevent Trump sinking the Republicans in 2018. And no amount of irrational backings by the Trumpites will prevent that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1
Vindicate
to clear (someone) of blame or suspicion
show or prove to be right, reasonable, or justified
You certainly can be vindicated of suspicion or blame while not being charged with anything.
To WaldoKitty:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1
I think your expectations of certain posters might be a little lofty. This is a person who cannot even acknowledge he was wrong when he told you that unless a person has been charged with a crime, he cannot be vindicated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch
Please refrain from putting words in my mouth. I know it is a standard right wing tactic but it is still unacceptable.
I said no such thing.
I'm not on the right, but nice try.
Have you really already forgotten what you've posted??
Well, you know what they say ...If you can't find any evidence, obviously you need to dig deeper. This is an investigation searching for a crime to investigate. Ridiculous!
Normally evidence is sought after a crime has been committed. In this case, a 'crime' has been alleged, and they are looking for evidence to support the allegation. Good luck.
Have you forgotten how to read? No where do I say "charged with a crime"...no where.
Charged can be anything...rude to a sales clerk. spitting on the floor.
In fact I make it quite clear no crime is required to impeach a President...which is the truth.
OK you post like a Ring Winger. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvmensch One cannot be vindicated if not charged. And again criminal charges are not necessary for impeachment.
Wow - you are something else. You just cannot admit you're wrong - even when it's written for all to see for all of eternity.
You jumped from 'if not charged' to 'and again, criminal charges are not necessary for impeachment' but you want us to believe the two weren't connected.
You used some form of the word 'charged' twice and referenced how criminal charges wouldn't be necessary in order to impeach during a discussion where WaldoKitty said Trump has been vindicated.
We all know what you meant no matter how many times you try and spin it now.
You must be dizzy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
