Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You lost the argument. Now you try to make it about me.
Time to put on those big boy pants and move on.
Trump won't be impeached.
Russians had nothing to do with Hillary's loss.
I just baited you. You passed with your model of consistency. And I never started an argument to lose. And I never used the word impeached or even insinuated it. And did I say Hillary? You proved my point whether you believe it or not....which I know you don't. So I'm pretty sure I know who should be putting on their big boy pants and move on, but to make you happy I will do so.
Specifically how did the Russians force the people here in the battle ground state of NC to vote for Trump?
I think your expectations of certain posters might be a little lofty. This is a person who cannot even acknowledge he was wrong when he told you that unless a person has been charged with a crime, he cannot be vindicated.
Comedy legally relayed the story to the net. Get it legally. How did the story via trump get to the media that comedy was a nut job? When tump told the media that he was not subject to an investigation was he leaking?
Please explain your apparently bizarre definition of leaking?
So, lets get this straight, you are really comparing what someone actually leaked to the press vs. trump stating he was not being investigated?
And BTW, the nut job comment was never verified....
Now, please explain how one is able to say something that is not leaking, and the other that was said (if it was even said) in a meeting.....how are they the same?
The problem was not with firing Comey, had trump done that day 1 no one would have been surprised but the opposite occurred and from the looks of it trump did so only to attempt to end an investigation, which by the way has the opposite effect.
Only idiots think that firing the head of "Any" agency will stop any investigation.....
Damn folks, think about it.....
So, this is the narrative:
There is a new mayor in town.
The new mayor fires the chief of police.
Throw all the cases out, the chief of police was fired by the new mayor....
That's what the left is trying to present right now...
I think your expectations of certain posters might be a little lofty. This is a person who cannot even acknowledge he was wrong when he told you that unless a person has been charged with a crime, he cannot be vindicated.
Please refrain from putting words in my mouth. I know it is a standard right wing tactic but it is still unacceptable.
Only idiots think that firing the head of "Any" agency will stop any investigation.....
Damn folks, think about it.....
So, this is the narrative:
There is a new mayor in town.
The new mayor fires the chief of police.
Throw all the cases out, the chief of police was fired by the new mayor....
That's what the left is trying to present right now...
Except you are not talking about a normal person in Trump, but a narcissist who thinks none of the rules apply to him.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
