Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-10-2017, 05:52 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonyafd View Post
Trump tweeted last night that Comey lied under oath repeatedly during yesterday's testimony.

It boggles the mind that someone who already has a bad reputation for lying would accuse a man who was the countries primary law enforcement officer since 2003 of repeated counts of perjury.

Here is a Comey biography: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_...2.80.931993.29

Judge for yourselves.

By the way, notes made after a meeting are admissible as evidence.
"It boggles the mind that someone who already has a bad reputation for lying"

Funny, I don't recall you complaining about Bill Clinton's (CCONVICTED IN COURT OF LYING), Hillary's or Obama's lying.

Why is it so important now to you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2017, 05:53 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 4,216,976 times
Reputation: 5466
so the people investigating all of this are the very people Trump is fighting against. the deep, entrenched system that actually runs the show and that operates on a quasi-public level with shadowy compartments. a system that can't account for trillions spent and won't give actual evidence and expects all of us to take their word for it. this isn't about Trump as much as it's about a corrupt govt system that is being exposed and they don't like it one bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 05:59 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Who's the Liar? The guy who's served 3 Presidents in 2 parties or the guy who says Obama was born in Kenya?
"The guy who's served 3 Presidents in 2 parties"

What does THAT have to do with anything.

I guess you DON'T recall he RESIGNED from the W. Bush admin.

You might want to kook up WHY.

He "lied' when he claimed on national TV that "NO reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against Hillary."

He lied when he said everybody who worked for the FBI liked him and were happy with him and how he let Hillary off the hook.

There are plenty more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:03 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
You will not get any reasonable debate from the Trumpers, they have nothing but insults to offer, but your are factually correct.

Trumpers hate Comey because he has their guy over a barrel.
"]You will not get any reasonable debate from the Trumpers, they have nothing but insults to offer,"'
It looks like you FON'T rewad any post from those on here do not like Trump.

They are FILLED with insults.

"Trumpers hate Comey"

I also fond that those who accuse others of "hate", are usually the guilty ones of the claim.

"because he has their guy over a barrel"

And Hillary is going to win the election becuae Trump doesn't stand a snowballs chance in hell of winning!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:10 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Comey has been known as "The Fixer" since Whitewater.

Comey’s involvement protecting Hillary goes back to the mid-1990s and Whitewater, when Comey served as a special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee.
We now know from the 246 pages of previously undisclosed internal memos released by Judicial Watch from Ken Starr’s Office of Independent Council investigation in 1998 that DOJ prosecutors had evidence that Hillary Clinton and her associate Webb Hubbell at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, were guilty of criminal fraud in the Whitewater affair.

From 1987 to 1993, Comey, working in the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York, served as the DOJ prosecutor who oversaw the prosecution of Marc Rich, the billionaire oil trader convicted of tax fraud and trading with Iran during the embassy hostage crisis.
But in 2001, when Bill Clinton decided on his last day in office to pardon Marc Rich, Comey oversaw the criminal investigation, but decided there was no wrongdoing on Bill Clinton’s part, “despite public outcry over the evidence that Rich’s ex-wife had donated to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign.â€

in 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, limited the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger so as to protect anyone in the former Clinton administration who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives.The documents Berger purloined from the Archives in his socks are believed to have contained incriminating evidence linking the Clinton administration to the terrorist build-up in the United States that culminated in the 9/11 terrorist attack.


( Cont. )




The Case Against James Comey - POLITICO Magazine

https://www.infowars.com/fbi-comey-a-clinton-fixer/
I've posted even MORE connections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:12 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,734,337 times
Reputation: 3038
Shouldn't the question be: "Who is the bigger and most documented liar? "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:21 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyMac18 View Post
Other people have that time to do it for us, and it's not pretty:

Donald Trump's file | PolitiFact
Politifact has been PROVEN to be biased

"Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?

"Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP.""


https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs...st-republicans

There are plenty of other evidence sites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:31 AM
 
Location: CT
3,440 posts, read 2,529,279 times
Reputation: 4639
When you have a closed door meeting, and there are no other witnesses, it's going to be one person's word over the other. Now it's going to be up to the committee to sort it out. The court of public opinion is moot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:31 AM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Pure BS, got some actual proof of your claims?
If you believed every "leaked" story by a "source" , then you should believe this one.

"'The atmosphere at the FBI has been toxic ever since Jim announced last July that he wouldn't recommend an indictment against Hillary,' said the source, a close friend who has known Comey for nearly two decades, shares family outings with him, and accompanies him to Catholic mass every week."

"'Some people, including department heads, stopped talking to Jim, and even ignored his greetings when they passed him in the hall,' said the source. 'They felt that he betrayed them and brought disgrace on the bureau by letting Hillary off with a slap on the wrist.'"

[LEFT]
Read more: Why FBI Director Comey jumped at chance to reopen Hillary Clinton email investigation | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



"
Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureau’s reputation for uncompromising investigations with his “cowardly” whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server.
[…]
But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.
“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit.
[…]
Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”
The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,” Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”


http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...investigation/


"But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.
“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit.
It doesn’t get any prettier either.
“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time,” Hughes said. “I hold Director Comey responsible.”
Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”
The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,” Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”
The story goes on with others expressing similar sentiments. And it’s completely understandable that they’d feel this way. Every decision Comey made leading up to his decision to not recommend the case to federal prosecutors has been virtually unprecedented in the FBI’s history. The federal law enforcement agency has been made yet another political tool under the Obama administration, and if Hillary Clinton wins in November, then it will keep being used as such.

"

But agents say Comey tied investigators’ hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.
“In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews,” said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBI’s computer investigations unit.
It doesn’t get any prettier either.
“The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time,” Hughes said. “I hold Director Comey responsible.”
Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: “Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.”
The accommodations afforded Clinton and her aides are “unprecedented,” Biasello added, “which is another way of saying this outcome was by design.” He called Comey’s decision not to seek charges “cowardly.”
The story goes on with others expressing similar sentiments. And it’s completely understandable that they’d feel this way. Every decision Comey made leading up to his decision to not recommend the case to federal prosecutors has been virtually unprecedented in the FBI’s history. The federal law enforcement agency has been made yet another political tool under the Obama administration, and if Hillary Clinton wins in November, then it will keep being used as such."


http://www.redstate.com/joesquire/20...t-james-comey/


Of course you won't believe any of them because none are from any of your leftie sites who will NOT report anything bad about a dem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2017, 06:35 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,702,384 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Check your timeline.
On May 12th Trump tweeted that Comey “better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press.”.
On May 16th the memo was leaked to the NYT.
Yep. Comey was scared that there MIGHT be tapes, so he wanted to get a jump on things to cover his backside. Going on the offensive can be better than being defensive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The reason the memo/notes are not on his gov. issue laptop, but a private computer, is because it had been taken away from him, when he decided he needed notes to save his ass.
Exactly. Sort of like keeping emails on a private server. His memo and notes were done while he was employed, therefore all of them are government property and NOT HIS TO LEAK.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonyafd View Post
Now that Trump's "Brown Shirts" have had their say along with the comments of others, I call on local police and state troopers wherever they are to denounce the President's allegations of perjury against Comey.
Don't hold your breath for that one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Yeah, I do think Trump is still on the apprentice. I think he does too. And Comey had no special privileges with Trump. He was the head of the FBI and knew he couldn't trust Trump. This is just who we want as the head of our intelligence agency. He didn't bow down to Trump because he works for the people of this country.
It appears he works for the Dems. He complied with Lynch's order (not "hope", not request, not suggestion, but direct order) to use the same terminology for Hillary's scandalous MATTER as the campaign was using. He said himself that he knew the purpose of that was to minimize the issue and that people would just forget about it. In effect, he became an extension of the Democrat campaign.

So, you think that by doing Lynch's bidding, he "works for the people of this country."

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top