Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you need to ask, then you seriously have IQ deficiencies.
The difference is that the Vegas wacko wasn’t a ISIS/Al Quaeda jihadist. Not that one is better or worse than other but they are entirely different situations.
How are these situations "entirely" different? The acts by both parties were/are meant to TERRORIZE.
No crystal ball needed. Just need common sense. You really think terrorist attacks won’t occur in the future and that this one will be the last? Are you really that dumb and naive?
You ARE the one telling us that terrorist attacks can be stopped in the future. Are you really that dumb and naive?
There is more than one definition, and there is no 100% agreed upon definition of the word. From one source...
noun
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political or ideological purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
So you could use that to say, "See! Only certain mass murderers are terrorists!" if you want. I would argue, however, that a mass murderer such as Stephen Paddock would fall into the same category. Reason being, unless you believe he killed all those people for absolutely no reason at all (and I mean none, because almost any reason you could think up would involve killing for political or ideological reasons), and was simply a psych case, then he would fall into the terrorist category.
You can look it up yourself and see what I mean when I say there is not an agreed upon definition. Our own government defines it in multiple different ways. Either way, if you think someone who murdered several dozen people and injured hundreds others isn't a terrorist, you are a moron. There is no reason for someone to shoot up a concert if it isn't to cause fear, panic, terror, and death.
nah! just proves you people are so bitter that you cannot call it for what it is.
You people? Everybody that didn't vote for your dear idiot leader? I didn't vote for Hillary. I am not a liberal. You are trolling. Nothing less, nothing more.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
