Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Kimba Wood, a.k.a. the "Love Judge" and former Playboy Bunny, will hear the Michael Cohen case. She was dubbed the "Love Judge" after her steamy affair with millionaire Frank Richardson was discovered by his wife, who found his diary. Richardson described her as a "complete woman" who was able to "give love wonderfully and freely." Kimba Wood, at the time was married to Time political columnist, Michael Kramer. Kramer had interviewed Bill Clinton for Time's "Man of the Year" piece."
Wood nearly became Bill Clinton's Attorney General, and was Hillary's pick, after Kramer had suggested her to Bill and Hillary. But her nomination was withdrawn when it was learned that she had hired an illegal alien as a baby sitter. This was after Zoe Baird had dropped out under similar circumstances.
Wood had insisted that Cohen disclose that Sean Hannity was one of his clients. She disallowed Cohen's request for a "Special Master" to sort out what is considered "attorney client privilege," and in doing so, also violated Sean Hannity's right to "attorney client privilege."
So, we have a former Clinton nominee overseeing a case involving a Clinton political opponent's attorney, and a case which has nothing to do with "Russian collusion."
What else is new?
Hmmmm, sounds like SOMEONE is a little jealous , if you ask me.
So, she would have been nominated by Ronald Reagan.
Doubtful.
Quote:
since Mr. Hannity has publicly stated that Mr. Cohen was never his attorney, then the attorney-client privilege does not apply. Mr. Hannity can't have it both ways.
If Hannity was not a client, then why was Cohen forced to reveal his name? It's obvious that Cohen considered Hannity a client. Therefore, attorney client privilege does apply.
Hannity's statements were to the affect that he had asked Cohen for advice on several occasions. However, Cohen had never officially represented him in any case. Perhaps to you that does not entitle him to "attorney client privilege." But your opinion isn't what governs. It is the law that governs.
And, no, that was not the only article I read, however it was included as a link from other articles, which I also read. So what?
US law does not allow the current president to pick and choose judges. Thought GOP loved the rule of law.
Who said it did? However, it is interesting that prosecutors (Mueller) are able to direct cases to jurisdictions that would be favorable to their case.
If Hannity was not a client, then why was Cohen forced to reveal his name? It's obvious that Cohen considered Hannity a client. Therefore, attorney client privilege does apply.
LOL, well the client is saying he was never a client and that means that "privilege" does no exist .Read a law book.
If Hannity was not a client, then why was Cohen forced to reveal his name? It's obvious that Cohen considered Hannity a client. Therefore, attorney client privilege does apply.
Hannity's statements were to the affect that he had asked Cohen for advice on several occasions. However, Cohen had never officially represented him in any case. Perhaps to you that does not entitle him to "attorney client privilege." But your opinion isn't what governs. It is the law that governs.
And, no, that was not the only article I read, however it was included as a link from other articles, which I also read. So what?
Doubtful that Judge Wood had been nominated by President Reagan? In 1988?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.