Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Amazing how many Russia fans exist on CD. It pretty obvious that the firm owned by Putin's cook wants to gain information, did anyone notice none of the other firms chose to challenge the indictment. There is a lot at risk to disclose all sources and information, do people love Trump so much that they would want to provide classified information to the Russians.
Let's recap...zero actual evidence of russian hacking anything. That went nowhere.
Zero actual evidence of russians posting ads on FB....the only people making this claim is FB...known for being a cesspool of rabid leftists with a globalist agenda.
Zero evidence that any US person colluded with anyone else in the commission of the above allegations.
So in other words, zero basis for a special prosecutor in the first place.
BTW "collusion" is not a federal crime, at least not in the context that anyone involved in a political campaign could engage in.
The only problem is there is NO EVIDENCE for this speculation or belief.
It has no "basis". There is not even any "reasonable suspicion".
And there is no motive. Why help everyone but Clinton? It makes no sense. Suddenly the Russians turn against their friend and benefactor of US uranium reserves? Why would they shower her and her Foundation with millions, only to turn around and spend time/money to hurt her election opportunities? What is the "motive" for this kind of process to occur?
Amazing how many Russia fans exist on CD. It pretty obvious that the firm owned by Putin's cook wants to gain information, did anyone notice none of the other firms chose to challenge the indictment. There is a lot at risk to disclose all sources and information, do people love Trump so much that they would want to provide classified information to the Russians.
Why should they? If Russia indicted me, I would ignore it.
Amazing how many Russia fans exist on CD. It pretty obvious that the firm owned by Putin's cook wants to gain information, did anyone notice none of the other firms chose to challenge the indictment. There is a lot at risk to disclose all sources and information, do people love Trump so much that they would want to provide classified information to the Russians.
What classified information?
This is a case about internet trolls.
Can you honestly say you don't think Mueller is stalling?
First he played games, and didn't send out proper summons.
He then begs for a delay, and is denied.
He then threatens to dump over 2 terabytes of evidence into the court to bog it down.
And now he doesn't want to disclose his evidence.
Seriously, can you honestly say you don't think Mueller is stalling?
The only problem is there is NO EVIDENCE for this speculation or belief.
It has no "basis". There is not even any "reasonable suspicion".
And there is no motive. Why help everyone but Clinton? It makes no sense. Suddenly the Russians turn against their friend and benefactor of US uranium reserves? Why would they shower her and her Foundation with millions, only to turn around and spend time/money to hurt her election opportunities? What is the "motive" for this kind of process to occur?
Oh I dunno, maybe because they knew she wouldn't follow the script had she won. Or maybe because they thought her chances of winning were remote.
OR maybe it's because they've got Trump by the balls and a bird in the hand is better than two Clintons in the bush?
Let's recap...zero actual evidence of russian hacking anything. That went nowhere.
Zero actual evidence of russians posting ads on FB....the only people making this claim is FB...known for being a cesspool of rabid leftists with a globalist agenda.
Zero evidence that any US person colluded with anyone else in the commission of the above allegations.
So in other words, zero basis for a special prosecutor in the first place.
BTW "collusion" is not a federal crime, at least not in the context that anyone involved in a political campaign could engage in.
Absolute nonsense, if you disagree take it up with all the intelligence agencies.
Can you honestly say you don't think Mueller is stalling?
First he played games, and didn't send out proper summons.
He then begs for a delay, and is denied.
He then threatens to dump over 2 terabytes of evidence into the court to bog it down.
And now he doesn't want to disclose his evidence.
Seriously, can you honestly say you don't think Mueller is stalling?
How do you think they were able to determine that these companies were responsible, intelligence.
Yes I think Mueller was surprised that one of these firms would actually respond, easy enough to do through a law firm. So where are the others if this is a house of cards.
This was more than just internet trolls acting independently. it was coordinated by these companies. What did they have to gain.
Discovery is a beech, when you didn't expect the other party to actually show up to clear their name.
You cannot have it both ways Mueller. You cannot create law, by requesting censorship of government transparency.
They work for you, they work for me. They are not Kings.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
