Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:30 PM
 
17 posts, read 5,215 times
Reputation: 53

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Trump didn't care about corruption last year when he released the aid to Ukraine. Why was this year different? It's because he wanted dirt on his political opponent. You can't do that as president. Doesn't matter to you or others though. And if the Dems lose, they lose. They at least did the right thing in uncovering Trump's abuse of power and corruption. Not that it matters to the GOP or Trump supporters.
What was different is a new Ukrainian president was elected - a man known for being strong against corruption, in a historically corrupt country. I think what Trump did was unseemly, but NOT illegal. Not one witness had first-hand knowledge of an unlawful act. If there was a QPQ, it was well-hidden. Folks may SUSPECT, and draw an assumption, that there was a QPQ, but we don't impeach in this country based on assumptions and rumors. The Dems have been very effective at blurring the line between proven fact and unproven rumor, and a lot of folks have bought into that. Asking for a favor is not proof of a QPQ or bribery. I don't think it looks good, and I think it's unprofessional, but that's a far cry from being illegal.

For the record, I don't hate liberals/Democrats. I agree with and support some liberal policies. I do not care for the Communists who try to disguise themselves as progressives/Democratic Socialists, however.

There are PLENTY of Democrats and Republicans who ARE good Americans. It's just unfortunate that some are stupid enough to let politicians play one group off of the other, creating divisiveness for their own self-serving and nefarious reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:43 PM
 
17 posts, read 5,215 times
Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Trump didn't care about corruption last year when he released the aid to Ukraine. Why was this year different? It's because he wanted dirt on his political opponent. You can't do that as president. Doesn't matter to you or others though. And if the Dems lose, they lose. They at least did the right thing in uncovering Trump's abuse of power and corruption. Not that it matters to the GOP or Trump supporters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
Since the accusations against the Bidens has been debunked, he can look to be sued for libel in the future. Good.

But Trump is guilty of trying to get a foreign government to persecute a US citizen, that is always wrong. Regardless of who the person is, it is always wrong for the president to turn on one of his own.

I wouldn't want him to do it to me and you wouldn't want him to do it to you. That's not what we hired him for.

Beyond that, Trump is guilty of trying to get a foreign government to persecute a US citizen on no evidence whatsoever, he is actually demanding the foreign government find some evidence!

If the thing was legitimate the US government would be sending evidence, not asking for evidence.

What is particularly troubling is how Trump has embraced a separate and distinct false narrative which has been traced back to Ukraine's rival, Russia. That's right, Trump believes a phony story concocted by the FSB to discredit it's rival and put distance between our nations. Putin is doing everything he can to destabilize Ukraine and isolate it from any potential friendly allies. Trump is playing along, wittingly or not, who can say?

But the biggest offense is that Trump was trying to influence the election by concocting a false narrative he could play up at his rallies, namely that there would be an investigation on 'the Bidens'. It didn't have to be a real investigation, all that is important is that the electorate THINK it is a real investigation, so it had to be publicly announced, so Trump could use it to hammer an opponent in public.

So Trump was faking a scandal to use in an election, and he was dragging a foreign country into it as his prop. This is not the first time Trump would be taking advantage of foreign help in an election, it is part of a pattern. The man is irredeemable.


"Perception is more important than reality. If someone perceives something to be true, it is more important than if it is in fact true. ... don't go out of your way to correct a false assumption if it plays to your advantage.”
Ivanka "I learned my moral compass from Daddy" Trump
Biden withheld aid to the Ukraine, until he leveraged the government to fire the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma - in effect, investigating the governing body of Burisma, the BoD, of which HIS SON was an officer of the board - in effect, investigating HIS SON and his cronies on the board! And he bragged about doing so on national TV! You don't have a problem with this??? That is the definition of a very clear conflict of interest AND a QPQ! In fact, Biden recently whined about how his staff ”failed” him by not telling him it was a conflict of interest! What, is he ten years old or something??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,655,075 times
Reputation: 9676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volobjectitarian View Post
Democrat Logic 102 - for the sake of democracy, this upcoming election is too important to be left up to the voters.
Not logical. Trump surviving impeachment may convince him that he needs to cut back on the insanity of Trump being Trump. Something Democrats don't need for the 2020 election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,364,797 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
You're just cheering for your team.
So are you - hence all the denials. Anything else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:52 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,544,846 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wabujitsu View Post
What was different is a new Ukrainian president was elected - a man known for being strong against corruption, in a historically corrupt country. I think what Trump did was unseemly, but NOT illegal. Not one witness had first-hand knowledge of an unlawful act. If there was a QPQ, it was well-hidden. Folks may SUSPECT, and draw an assumption, that there was a QPQ, but we don't impeach in this country based on assumptions and rumors. The Dems have been very effective at blurring the line between proven fact and unproven rumor, and a lot of folks have bought into that. Asking for a favor is not proof of a QPQ or bribery. I don't think it looks good, and I think it's unprofessional, but that's a far cry from being illegal.

For the record, I don't hate liberals/Democrats. I agree with and support some liberal policies. I do not care for the Communists who try to disguise themselves as progressives/Democratic Socialists, however.

There are PLENTY of Democrats and Republicans who ARE good Americans. It's just unfortunate that some are stupid enough to let politicians play one group off of the other, creating divisiveness for their own self-serving and nefarious reasons.
Quid pro Quo isn't necessary to be a 'high crime and misdemeanor". Impeachment is a POLITICAL remedy - not necessarily a legal one.

Simply ASKING a foreign government to announce a bogus investigation into your political rival is enough, IMO for abuse of power.

Impeaching Clinton for lying about his sex life seems far more of a waste than someone trying to fiddle with our 2020 election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:53 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,544,846 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by dman72 View Post
Behind most of it is just "I don't care about his abuse of power because I REALLY REALLY HATE LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS!!"

That's really all you need to know. The question is how low collectively can their moral/ethical levels sink to due to their hatred for the other side.
I mean - there IS that interview of the Trump voter stating that he didn't CARE if Russia interfered. If that's what it took to get his guy elected - that was absolutely fine with him.

I think he speaks for many of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,013,867 times
Reputation: 2167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
I mean - there IS that interview of the Trump voter stating that he didn't CARE if Russia interfered. If that's what it took to get his guy elected - that was absolutely fine with him.

I think he speaks for many of them.
OK, but you don't impeach the president based on what one of his voters said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 12:56 PM
 
13,511 posts, read 17,044,420 times
Reputation: 9691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wabujitsu View Post
What was different is a new Ukrainian president was elected - a man known for being strong against corruption, in a historically corrupt country. I think what Trump did was unseemly, but NOT illegal. Not one witness had first-hand knowledge of an unlawful act. If there was a QPQ, it was well-hidden. Folks may SUSPECT, and draw an assumption, that there was a QPQ, but we don't impeach in this country based on assumptions and rumors. The Dems have been very effective at blurring the line between proven fact and unproven rumor, and a lot of folks have bought into that. Asking for a favor is not proof of a QPQ or bribery. I don't think it looks good, and I think it's unprofessional, but that's a far cry from being illegal.

For the record, I don't hate liberals/Democrats. I agree with and support some liberal policies. I do not care for the Communists who try to disguise themselves as progressives/Democratic Socialists, however.

There are PLENTY of Democrats and Republicans who ARE good Americans. It's just unfortunate that some are stupid enough to let politicians play one group off of the other, creating divisiveness for their own self-serving and nefarious reasons.
There is no assumption. He withheld the aid, and released it only after he found it was being investigated. It wasn't "well hidden" it was obvious to anyone who isn't a Trump loyalists or hates Democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,328,605 times
Reputation: 7624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Impeaching Clinton for lying about his sex life seems far more of a waste than someone trying to fiddle with our 2020 election.
When someone lies under oath, it doesn't matter what the lie was about. It is still perjury which is against the law. As is witness tampering and obstructing justice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2019, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Clyde Hill, WA
6,061 posts, read 2,013,867 times
Reputation: 2167
Adam Schiff gave his fabricated version of the phone call, IIRC prior to the inquiry vote. Then Trump released the transcript, and everyone could see that Schiff had wildly prevaricated. Incredibly, he claimed that it had been intended as "parody." There was no indication of that when he said it. Alice in Wonderland stuff.

Then in the hearings yesterday under Nadler, someone (I think Dem counsel) cited Trump's line “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." Now that clearly was intended as parody (it was at a Trump rally), yet the Dem lawyer cites it as serious evidence.

Up is down, black is white. We truly are in Alice in Wonderland territory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top