Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:17 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,526,696 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
Iran though is backed into a corner; if they do not retaliate, then Iran will be view as very weak, and may cause internal dissent due to this by a combination of fronts. In the ME area, they will be viewed weak because what, zero retaliation due to such an event? However, if they do retaliate, then things could get ramped up quickly, and more severely, to the point the regime itself may be at risk of a direct attack, or having a significant portion of their military destroyed, thus control of Iran and perhaps the regime gets ousted.
Which is why they may very well decide to retaliate 1) through a proxy terrorist group, such as Hezbollah, against a proxy target, such as Israel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:17 PM
 
2,486 posts, read 1,420,936 times
Reputation: 3123
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976 View Post
I don't see why killing an Islamic terrorist is bad news. Thank you, Mr. Trump.
If Obuma would have had the nerve to order such a strike the ones complaining about Trump would be saluting Obuma...... Yall know thats the truth lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:18 PM
 
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
17,642 posts, read 6,918,695 times
Reputation: 16549
Quote:
Originally Posted by everwinter View Post
Targeted assassinations are illegal. This is only going to cause Iran to hate us even more & retaliate. They have a 'next man up' motto so this was a terrible move by the U.S. or Trump. Someone didn't think this through at all.
They're illegal? Then why wasn't anything done when Saint Obama did it 193 times?

Quote:
President Barack Obama has authorized 193 drone strikes in Pakistan since he took office in 2009, more than four times the number of attacks that President George W. Bush authorized during his two terms, according to the New America Foundation, a Washington-based public-policy institute.

Unmanned aircraft became part of the US arsenal in the 1990s, as reconnaissance drones recorded images of terrain in the Balkans. After the September 2001 terrorist attacks, President Bush signed a directive that authorized arming the drones, called Predators, with Hellfire missiles to try to take out terrorism suspects, according to military officials. He later widened the directive to allow strikes against anyone working inside terrorist camps, not just individual suspects.
Link: https://archives.cjr.org/feature/cov...secret_war.php

For the record, killing terrorists was one of the few things Obama did that I supported.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:18 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,581 posts, read 17,304,861 times
Reputation: 37354
Quote:
Originally Posted by take57 View Post
Just in case anyone gets the idea that Americans will always support a wartime President, just ask Lyndon Johnson or Richard Nixon how well that that works out, particularly when it occurs in a place most people couldn't find on a map if you spotted them a hemisphere.
That was a losing war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:20 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,526,696 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by everwinter View Post
Targeted assassinations are illegal. This is only going to cause Iran to hate us even more & retaliate. They have a 'next man up' motto so this was a terrible move by the U.S. or Trump. Someone didn't think this through at all.
You mean like when Osama bin Laden was targeted and executed under Obama? Was that illegal too, then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:20 PM
 
Location: TUS/PDX
7,825 posts, read 4,570,108 times
Reputation: 8859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
That was a losing war.
So you're ready to claim a victory on this Mission Accomplished-style?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:21 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,579,481 times
Reputation: 29290
Quote:
Originally Posted by everwinter View Post
Targeted assassinations are illegal.
like taking out bin laden?

- edit: beat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Huntsville, AL
2,985 posts, read 1,751,984 times
Reputation: 4405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
You mean like when Osama bin Laden was targeted and executed under Obama? Was that illegal too, then?
Exactly, I was super proud of Obama for taking out OBL, sadly, the America hating left can’t seem to give credit to our great President for taking out these terrorist vermin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:23 PM
 
Location: TUS/PDX
7,825 posts, read 4,570,108 times
Reputation: 8859
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
You mean like when Osama bin Laden was targeted and executed under Obama? Was that illegal too, then?
I suppose if you equate an attack on American soil the same as trashing an embassy overseas you might have a point... The only reason Obama did it was Bush couldn't get the job done right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2020, 09:23 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,221,200 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
Iran though is backed into a corner; if they do not retaliate, then Iran will be view as very weak, and may cause internal dissent due to this by a combination of fronts. In the ME area, they will be viewed weak because what, zero retaliation due to such an event? However, if they do retaliate, then things could get ramped up quickly, and more severely, to the point the regime itself may be at risk of a direct attack, or having a significant portion of their military destroyed, thus control of Iran and perhaps the regime gets ousted.
You’re dreaming.

If ousting the regime was possible, we would’ve done it a long time ago.

You can’t back the Iranians into a corner in their own region. It’s their home, we’re just visiting. Didn’t you learn anything from the 4500 dead Americans in Iraq?

The Iranians will bide their time and respond in kind. We’ve just knocked a hornet’s nest down to the ground, and the Iranian wasps WILL sting....hard. And people are gonna get hurt. Badly.

I hope you’ll be sounding this cocky in a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top