Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-11-2020, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,074,074 times
Reputation: 37337

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by clutchcargo777 View Post
I'm just not sure who that sort of cover is supposed to appeal to. The closest I can come to it is gay women but even that seems like a stretch.
this was a sinister plot carried out by radical puritan librarians
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-11-2020, 01:47 PM
 
2,923 posts, read 979,011 times
Reputation: 2080
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClaraC View Post
I remember when they had their first Black woman on the cover, and then 4 years ago when they had their first plus-sized model.

People do get upset at their choices - funny. While Miss America has faded into complete obscurity, Sports Illustrated choosing what defines feminine beauty makes headlines often. And controversially.

I think this is the first one that's making men mad. In the past, it seems men were always, "yeah, that's fine she's hot", where women were upset with the plus sized model. Because that lessened their "brand" claim that only thin women were beautiful.

Times they are a'changin.

But I do think this will end up being a marketing error in judgement. All the models in the past have been "types" of traditional female beauty, that appeal to some grouping of heterosexual men, in a soft-porn way. This is a different message altogether, that won't be taken well by the man who views himself a "Sports Illustrated" customer.
nobody really liked the fat chicks either
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 01:53 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,033 posts, read 9,512,383 times
Reputation: 10456
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville View Post
For the record: Bruce Jenner looks hideous as a woman! What is his new name?
Nancy Pelosi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Oklahoma
17,810 posts, read 13,708,449 times
Reputation: 17844
Quote:
Originally Posted by PotatoMan View Post
It’s not what it used to be. The swimsuit issue used to be a huge deal.
A lot of what the Swimsuit edition was about was awaiting the next issue or two to come out when all the moron readers would do their "Cancel My Subscripiton" letters to the editer. These people didn't realize that SI had been doing swimsuit issues every year since forever.

The swimsuit girls were hot and all but reading all those letters to the editor in subsequent issues was a just hilarious fun.

I guess maybe the shock effect with regular girls has worn off so they are going with transsexuals now. I'll have to re subscribe so I can read this bunch of letters to the editor. They ought to be great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 02:09 PM
 
10,780 posts, read 4,353,901 times
Reputation: 5839
I don't like swimsuits anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,836 posts, read 17,112,746 times
Reputation: 11535
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdaen View Post
That's just your 'insecurities' surfacing! LOL!


The best thing to do with the left is to laugh at them and fight back.


Personally, I'm ok with trannies (I realize they're dealing with a chemical imbalance) and if SI chooses to put one on the cover, people can choose not to buy it or cancel their subscription.
BUT, it does look like shameless pandering.
I try to keep away from judgements....i really do but when I heard this there was a definite blip on the radar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 02:23 PM
 
30,181 posts, read 11,815,563 times
Reputation: 18698
Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit View Post
Yeh.. agreed. Didn't cause problems with Victoria Secret either. Not my thing but I see no problem with it either. I would certainly understand if it triggers insecurities in certain people.. though. I think the wider public (outside of CD) really don't care.

Victoria's secret caters mostly to female shoppers. SI is geared mostly to male sports fans. I have no issue with transgendered people they have a right to live their life as they want. However part of the whole swimsuit issue is to feature beautiful woman that guys long after. Putting a dude on there is not ok. Anymore than putting a gay dude on the cover would be. Some guys are into this sort of thing but they have mags and websites for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,646 posts, read 9,472,982 times
Reputation: 22988
Quote:
Originally Posted by chief scum View Post
The homosexuals claim they were born that way and the transgenders claim they weren't born that way.

I figure that is an argument that they can have amongst themselves.
That's not even the tip of the iceberg buddy.

There are female transgenders who keep their male genitalia and seek men and there are other female transgenders who remove their genitals and still seek men. Then you have male transgenders who seek men or women.

Leave if up to humans to make 2 genders so complicated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 02:41 PM
 
3,306 posts, read 1,348,212 times
Reputation: 2730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oklazona Bound View Post
Victoria's secret caters mostly to female shoppers. SI is geared mostly to male sports fans. I have no issue with transgendered people they have a right to live their life as they want. However part of the whole swimsuit issue is to feature beautiful woman that guys long after. Putting a dude on there is not ok. Anymore than putting a gay dude on the cover would be. Some guys are into this sort of thing but they have mags and websites for that.
Valentina Sampaio is a trans woman. These types of magazines have an incredible platform to steer cultural conversations. They made the decision to support inclusion and love. Don’t buy the magazine if you dislike their editorial decisions. Grow up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-11-2020, 03:08 PM
 
380 posts, read 126,000 times
Reputation: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
That's not even the tip of the iceberg buddy.

There are female transgenders who keep their male genitalia and seek men and there are other female transgenders who remove their genitals and still seek men. Then you have male transgenders who seek men or women.

Leave if up to humans to make 2 genders so complicated.
I'm confused.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top