Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A Chinese scientist is called in to investigate a deadly virus in Wuhan, finds troublesome facts, is muzzled by the CCP, flees for her life to the U.S., speaks her own truth, and then is muzzled by the "free" America social media. Where's the outrage?
If this virus was engineered, it was done so to disrupt more than kill. If the virus targets the old and/or sick, what parts of the world have populations with large numbers that fit that description? The West, Japan etc. and a large part of the worlds economy.
Not saying they did this, but if they felt threatened by the West, this is one big move to retribution and power posturing. China would also know that nothing could really be done about if they covered it up enough. What’s anyone going to do; nuke em’? It would be one hell of a move if it where so though?
A Chinese scientist is called in to investigate a deadly virus in Wuhan, finds troublesome facts, is muzzled by the CCP, flees for her life to the U.S., speaks her own truth, and then is muzzled by the "free" America social media. Where's the outrage?
Because it's not in their best interests to do so.
Confirming that the virus was engineered in the lab, would result in two things:
-- less funding for gain of function research, which = fewer jobs for those scientists.
-- far more stringent safety/operating procedures, which would make those scientists' lives very difficult.
Not to mention science is highly politicized today and many scientists are liberals. A virus made by CCP where the world needs to take action against CCP does not fit their narrative.
Was the Tweet wrong? I don't care who said it. The Tweet is accurate.
no, the tweet is not accurate.
none of her "facts" and "her own truth", as navarro refers to it, have been peer reviewed. he has his neocon agenda to push and is using her as scientific evidence that the virus was intentionally created/released. if he were to be honest, he'd wait until the scientific community gives their stamp of approval on her evidence.
I wouldn't be surprised if this is all a ploy to take the heat off of trump for his woodward interview. the fact that she has ties to steve bannon should be raising all kinds of flags.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
