Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was never about the 'evidence' or 'truth.' It is about the radical liberal agenda, and the global socialists' darling Justin Trudeau is part of that squad. These news agencies were spinning the stories the way George Soros and The Great Reset team ordered them to.
But it's an interesting change to have an activist poster not be hostile and emotional when they respond.
All you need know about the woo han virus is a full awareness of how communists think and operate.
A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting, but the scorpion argues that if it did that, they would both drown. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. The frog lets the scorpion climb on its back and then begins to swim. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature."
This looks very much like bio warfare. They created chaos and got Trump out of office. Barely. And to commies, a few million lives are of no consequence.
I've been saying since day one that not only did it come from that lab, it didn't "leak" it was deliberately released as a bioweapon against the world because China's endgame was getting blocked by Trump and the rise of western populism. No amount of insults or mockery has swayed me from that opinion one bit.
I 100% agree with you on that. Many of the world leaders know the truth. But to let out the truth could set off WWIII.
All you need know about the woo han virus is a full awareness of how communists think and operate.
A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting, but the scorpion argues that if it did that, they would both drown. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. The frog lets the scorpion climb on its back and then begins to swim. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature."
This looks very much like bio warfare. They created chaos and got Trump out of office. Barely. And to commies, a few million lives are of no consequence.
Excellent response. Too bad so many don’t see it that way. Or refuse to look close enough to see the forest through the trees.
President Donald Trump said Friday he is not concerned that China might be covering up the full extent of the coronavirus after speaking on Thursday with China's leader Xi Jinping, who he said has been “strong, sharp and powerfully focused” in his efforts to fight to the spread of the virus.
“No, China's working very hard,” Trump told ABC News' Karen Travers. “Late last night I had a very good talk with President XI and we talked about mostly about the coronavirus. They're working really hard and I think they're doing a very professional job. They're in touch with the world health organization, CDC also.”
Not surprised you won't take the time to research yourself. And you call yourself a doctor? SHEESH!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOkidd
So, do you think backtracking is bad? Should they continue to stick to their original reporting even as the evidence that they were wrong mounts?
Or is “backtracking” just a way of saying that they changed their reporting when credible evidence they were wrong surfaced? Facts on the ground change and their “backtracking” is not a bad thing. I wish others would be so willing to “backtrack” in light of overwhelming evidence.
The problem is these "fact-checkers" like at wapo dismissed it outright and labeled anyone who believed it as a conspiracy theorist. Why would they do that when evidence BACK THEN pointed to what is being said now? Because there's an agenda being played out here... An honest newspaper would bring all evidence to the table and say it is possible. You're acting like they had evidence saying there was no way this could be true because that's what they acted like.
By the way, in your novel post you said the Great Reset is "boogeyman" but there's literally a website setup by the world economic forum (backed by numerous nations and "foundations"). Keep up man!
The held this 50th annual WEF get-together in June 2020. How convenient. Right around the time the "build back better" slogans emerged. Pure coincidence I'm sure.
The media will never take responsibility for what they did. The acted with certainty about the bat theory because Trump liked the lab leak theory.
They vilified everyone who disagreed with the bat theory, and big Tech censored and de-platformed them. But now they are trying to make it look like they're just following the new information, but this is too recent to go down the memory hole. People remember.
The media will never take responsibility for what they did. The acted with certainty about the bat theory because Trump liked the lab leak theory.
They vilified everyone who disagreed with the bat theory, and big Tech censored and de-platformed them. But now they are trying to make it look like they're just following the new information, but this is too recent to go down the memory hole. People remember.
This is why it's always important to archive everything. DVR it, download the youtube videos, take screenshots of articles, and place the links in archive websites so they don't get lost. (((They))) know they can fool millions of people who won't question anything if it comes from a source they like, but there's a lot of critical thinkers and people with good memories too.
Also the fact that faux news took the clip down from the scientists on Tucker's show (son of CIA agents) should show everyone who they're in bed with. I don't even know why people put so much trust in Tucker as if he's that much different than the liberal outlets pushing bull****. He's a part of the system too.
Not surprised you won't take the time to research yourself. And you call yourself a doctor? SHEESH!
I've been devoting much of my post-doc retirement time to reading, researching, discussing and learning about Pandemic related topics since it all started. Well over 100 hrs just in CME.
You were going to show me some videos related to the virus origin with discussion dating to December of 2019. And if you can't, well thanks anyway.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
