Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Depends what part of the economy someone cares about and what's going on at the time they vote.
Lots of things could change leading up to the midterms. Most things economic today are supply/demand issues tied to the pandemic. Few people are stupid enough to think a President of any party has a significant degree of control over that.
And like I said, EVERY woman understands what a child can mean for her economically.
Killing a child is not an answer to economic rough patches. Just like one can't kill their landlord when one can't pay the rent.
Killing a child is not an answer to economic rough patches. Just like one can't kill their landlord when one can't pay the rent.
An abortion is most definitely the answer to not incurring the costs of raising a child, as well as avoiding the impact that child might have on educational/career opportunities which significantly impact your future economic wellbeing.
An abortion is most definitely the answer to not incurring the costs of raising a child, as well as avoiding the impact that child might have on educational/career opportunities which significantly impact your future economic wellbeing.
Can one likewise kill the supervisor keeping one from advancing at one's job?
How is killing a human life for the sake of economic convenience any different than killing one's landlord because one can't pay their rent or killing one's supervisor at work because they're keeping one from advancing in their job?
Reminder: This thread is NOT about pro-choice vs. pro-life.
It's about what happens in America when and if SCOTUS overturns R v W.
The regulation of abortion returns to the states, where it belongs. Same as gun control laws. Gun rights are regulated by the states. So, too, will abortion rights be regulated by the states.
How is killing a human life for the sake of economic convenience any different than killing one's landlord because one can't pay their rent or killing one's supervisor at work because they're keeping one from advancing in their job?
Economic convenience? LMAO
Talk to yourself for a while. I'm sure you will be able to figure it out.
Can one likewise kill the supervisor keeping one from advancing at one's job?
As been pointed out to you numerous times. A fetus in the womb is far different than a fully realized born person
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
