Mississippi asks Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade; says 1973 decision was "egregiously wrong" (legal, stats)

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Female babies become... women. The pro-abortion contingent quite gleefully advocates killing at least 350,000 of them each year.

Gleeful? Hyperbolic much.

[newtovenice]

[quote=Blondy;62470365]

Originally Posted by newtovenice

Not unless you can back it up.

Back up what?

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by newtovenice

Don't forget the most dangerous place for a black baby is in his or her mother's womb.

Although blacks make up abut 13% of thee population, they account for >35% of all abortions. 1 out of 3 black babies are aborted.

But not a peep from BLM. Killing black babies is perfectly acceptable.

That's abhorrent. And racist. How does the pro-abortion contingent NOT see that?

[newtovenice]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

That's abhorrent. And racist. How does the pro-abortion contingent NOT see that?

You would think certain political groups would jump on this as part of their diversity campaigns. But no.

To use language that abortion advocates embrace:

I guess only 'old white men religious conservatives' care about the lives of black babies?

[Blondy]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

The MS law currently being contested at SCOTUS already keeps abortion legal.

If Roe is overturned as MS has requested, it will be illegal for most women. Same thing.

[Blondy]

[quote=newtovenice;62470385]

Originally Posted by Blondy

Back up what?

The stats you posted.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Blondy

If Roe is overturned as MS has requested, it will be illegal for most women.

Nope. Had the pro-abortion idiots not sued MS, abortion would still have been legal for the over 92% of women who seek abortion prior to the 15th week.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6907a1.htm

[newtovenice]

[quote=Blondy;62470507]

Originally Posted by newtovenice

The stats you posted.

What stats?

Be specific instead of deliberately argumentative.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by newtovenice

I've seen statistics that vary tremendously regarding elective abortions at late term. States report and record data differently, and may have different definitions of what late-term abortion is.

Ranges for elective late-term abortions are from 30% to 80% of all late-term abortions. Which is why I did not include a percent initially because stating a percent with 100% confidence cannot be done because the data isn't there.

Instead I stated that YES there ARE ELECTIVE LATE-TERM ABORTIONS. [Caps for those in the back row.]


But yes, ELECTIVE later-term abortions are performed where perfectly healthy mothers have perfectly healthy babies killed.

That is a fact.

Really not the issue but it deserves more details as to the reasoning, maybe you have a credible link to back that up. I can't imagine anyone would carry for 8 months and then decide to terminate without reason. Still that is not the issue, most are done for very good reasons but you posted the exception.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Nope. Had the pro-abortion idiots not sued MS, abortion would still have been legal for the over 92% of women who seek abortion prior to the 15th week.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/ss/ss6907a1.htm

Please, this was the court they have been waiting 50 years for, you make it sound like Mississippi is the only state with restrictions. This is a dream come true for the religious fanatics that view this as some sort of solution.