Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As an adopted person I can say without hesitation that I’m glad abortion was not legal when I was conceived.
I do not oppose the Texas ruling/law. It does not ban abortion but simply forces people to plan ahead and act more responsibly.
That being said I would still rather live in a free country where my personal decisions on what to do with my own body aren’t anyone’s business. That goes for abortion, vaccines, drugs of any kind, assisted suicide etc…
The only caveat being that nobody else should be required to pay for or fund what you decide to do with your own body. When you start expecting to have your choices paid for by others then they have the right to establish rules.
1. You are not a "baby" until you are born. That is the dictionary definition.
2. I personally am fine with adoption. Problem is our foster care system is broken and republicans have no interest in fixing or funding it.
3. I'm straight, but the fact that we still have laws preventing and hindering LGBT from adopting further shows that republicans dont take adoption serious.
4. You dont have to be an "advocate" to have an opinion on this matter. Stop putting people in a box.
As an adopted person I can say without hesitation that I’m glad abortion was not legal when I was conceived.
I do not oppose the Texas ruling/law. It does not ban abortion but simply forces people to plan ahead and act more responsibly.
That being said I would still rather live in a free country where my personal decisions on what to do with my own body aren’t anyone’s business. That goes for abortion, vaccines, drugs of any kind, assisted suicide etc…
The only caveat being that nobody else should be required to pay for or fund what you decide to do with your own body. When you start expecting to have your choices paid for by others then they have the right to establish rules.
What makes it unconstitutional? I can go to town and shoot someone and its unlawful and I get charged with murder, but if Im standing in my home and someone breaks in I can shoot them and its lawful and Im not charged. So whats unconstitutional about that?
It's as much of my business as when a parent murders a toddler. In both cases, a child dies at the hands of the parent.
Why? Are you a cop or prosecutor? Otherwise, I don't think any single woman or married couple would appreciate you nosing in on their reproductive decisions. For instance, a woman wanting the services of an abortion clinic would not want your interference there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
