Biden to nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to Supreme Court (Utah, Congress)

[Annandale_Man]

Originally Posted by Mathguy

Because they couldn't get into Harvard.

It's like asking why so many nobel prize winning economists are from U of CHicago PHDs.

The point is that "government" schools should only be considered for "government" jobs.

[Annandale_Man]

Originally Posted by RowingFiend

A first year law school could probably make more sense than KBJ does in her opinions, which are usually reversed. She's an imbecile, but worse than that she's a Marxist. Classic affirmative action hire.

Affirmative Jackson will be her name forever.

[moneill]

Originally Posted by Annandale_Man

Affirmative Jackson will be her name forever.

Affirmative Amy welcomes her the club

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by RowingFiend

Hmm. If I ask questions about her rulings, will you call me a racist like your imbecile President Joe Biden?

You can intelligently question her rulings, calling her an imbecile is dumb.

[RowingFiend]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

You can intelligently question her rulings, calling her an imbecile is dumb.

Well it’s better than calling her a rapist.

[Bentonite]

Originally Posted by trobesmom

She didn't say she didn't know what a woman was. BTW, the question wasn't, "do you know what a woman is?" She was asked to define "woman."

Why didn't she just say, "An adult biological female human being." Just six words. That's pretty easy!

[natalie469]

Originally Posted by Bentonite

Why didn't she just say, "An adult biological female human being." Just six words. That's pretty easy!

Body parts determine your sex. They don't determine your gender though which is way more complicated.

[Bentonite]

Originally Posted by natalie469

Body parts determine your sex. They don't determine your gender though which is way more complicated.

This thread isn't about transgenderism.

[Goodnight]

Originally Posted by Bentonite

This thread isn't about transgenderism.

Agreed it shouldn't be but the republican 2022 campaign began with the senate confirmation hearings bringing up CRT and transgender. This is the best they can do to criticizes a supreme court nomination, none of which has anything to do with a sitting judge.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Agreed it shouldn't be but the republican 2022 campaign began with the senate confirmation hearings bringing up CRT and transgender. This is the best they can do to criticizes a supreme court nomination, none of which has anything to do with a sitting judge.

As more states pass laws banning transgender genetic males (XY chromosomes) from competing in girls'/women's sports the issue of "what is a woman" may very well be extremely relevant if any of those state laws are challenged at SCOTUS.

From his/her testimony to Congress under oath, we know where KBJ lies on that issue. He'll/she'll support the Democrats' ongoing efforts to completely claw back genetic girls' and women's (XX chromosomes) Title IX Rights. 1972-2022. RIP Title IX. The Democrats hate it.