Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-07-2022, 11:05 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,218,646 times
Reputation: 8528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Indeed, it is. But Biden and the Dems backed a SCOTUS nominee that won't define what a woman is which implies that he/she won't support biological girls and women and their Title IX Rights. WHY??? WHY are Democrats so anti-Title IX? WHY do Democrats hate biological girls and women???

I refer to KJB as he/she because even he/she doesn't know which he/she is.
Bingo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2022, 11:33 PM
 
Location: The High Desert
16,092 posts, read 10,757,764 times
Reputation: 31499
If you or Senator Blackburn do not know what a woman is by the time you are a functioning adult or a US senator on a high-level committee, you need to ask your mom or perhaps your doctor, not a lawyer or a judge. Judge Jackson chose not to play the Republican's junior high game. That shows she recognizes the perverse media ploy the Republicans were using. It is not a serious question. Well played, Justice Jackson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 01:34 AM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,027 posts, read 5,991,147 times
Reputation: 5704
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
If you or Senator Blackburn do not know what a woman is by the time you are a functioning adult or a US senator on a high-level committee, you need to ask your mom or perhaps your doctor, not a lawyer or a judge. Judge Jackson chose not to play the Republican's junior high game. That shows she recognizes the perverse media ploy the Republicans were using. It is not a serious question. Well played, Justice Jackson.
The simple truth is that Jackson is being sponsored by the lunie left and answering that question might have 'offended' them. So yes, she did answer wisely, except that she actually screwed it up by invoking a biologist instead of a legal linguist.

It was a ploy to expose her left leaning woke agenda. That little question was just the beginning. Her following refusal to answer simple yes or no question and her denial of knowing about CRT in schools proved she is not suitable for the position on the supreme court. She lied in congress more than once. Even lying about not knowing the definition of 'woman'. All she had to do was "A woman is an adult female human being". As a judge, she would know that. But you can see how that would offend the lunatic left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
Why should it be your business?
Biden promised he would nominate a Black woman. KBJ doesn't know if he/she is a woman or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:12 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
If you or Senator Blackburn do not know what a woman is by the time you are a functioning adult or a US senator on a high-level committee, you need to ask your mom or perhaps your doctor, not a lawyer or a judge. Judge Jackson chose not to play the Republican's junior high game. That shows she recognizes the perverse media ploy the Republicans were using. It is not a serious question. Well played, Justice Jackson.
Title IX Rights are no "game" no matter HOW much you and the unhinged left want to claw them back. Genetic women and girls (XX chromosomes) fought long and hard for those Rights. Then Biden nominates KBJ and Democrats JUMP at the chance to erase 50 years of progress. 1972-2022. RIP Title IX.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:13 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,643 posts, read 9,468,698 times
Reputation: 22986
Quote:
Originally Posted by take57 View Post
Must be a tough day if you're white, male, a misogynist and/or a racist.
Must be a tough day if you think Biden can legislate us blacks up the social ladder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:17 AM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,024,933 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyxjon View Post
And Kentanji Jackson was added because she’s a black woman.
In both cases, the candidates were on the list of people that were qualified for the position. So yes when examining list of candidates all with similar experience it was decided in both cases that other criteria would be beneficial for the supreme Court representation. But somehow when a Democrat does it it's bad but when a Republican does it it's not so bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:18 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,643 posts, read 9,468,698 times
Reputation: 22986
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboyxjon View Post
And Kentanji Jackson was added because she’s a black woman.
Well she's not a biologist, so she could still be a man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:23 AM
 
51,654 posts, read 25,836,151 times
Reputation: 37894
Judge Brown Jackson knows if she is a woman or not.

Clearly, she can also recognize idiots and their nonsense.

Pretty apparent on C-D as well
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2022, 04:26 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,059 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Judge Brown Jackson knows if she is a woman or not.
Clearly, he/she does not. Or is it your contention he/she lied to Congress under oath?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top