Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Indeed, it is. But Biden and the Dems backed a SCOTUS nominee that won't define what a woman is which implies that he/she won't support biological girls and women and their Title IX Rights. WHY??? WHY are Democrats so anti-Title IX? WHY do Democrats hate biological girls and women???
I refer to KJB as he/she because even he/she doesn't know which he/she is.
If you or Senator Blackburn do not know what a woman is by the time you are a functioning adult or a US senator on a high-level committee, you need to ask your mom or perhaps your doctor, not a lawyer or a judge. Judge Jackson chose not to play the Republican's junior high game. That shows she recognizes the perverse media ploy the Republicans were using. It is not a serious question. Well played, Justice Jackson.
If you or Senator Blackburn do not know what a woman is by the time you are a functioning adult or a US senator on a high-level committee, you need to ask your mom or perhaps your doctor, not a lawyer or a judge. Judge Jackson chose not to play the Republican's junior high game. That shows she recognizes the perverse media ploy the Republicans were using. It is not a serious question. Well played, Justice Jackson.
The simple truth is that Jackson is being sponsored by the lunie left and answering that question might have 'offended' them. So yes, she did answer wisely, except that she actually screwed it up by invoking a biologist instead of a legal linguist.
It was a ploy to expose her left leaning woke agenda. That little question was just the beginning. Her following refusal to answer simple yes or no question and her denial of knowing about CRT in schools proved she is not suitable for the position on the supreme court. She lied in congress more than once. Even lying about not knowing the definition of 'woman'. All she had to do was "A woman is an adult female human being". As a judge, she would know that. But you can see how that would offend the lunatic left.
If you or Senator Blackburn do not know what a woman is by the time you are a functioning adult or a US senator on a high-level committee, you need to ask your mom or perhaps your doctor, not a lawyer or a judge. Judge Jackson chose not to play the Republican's junior high game. That shows she recognizes the perverse media ploy the Republicans were using. It is not a serious question. Well played, Justice Jackson.
Title IX Rights are no "game" no matter HOW much you and the unhinged left want to claw them back. Genetic women and girls (XX chromosomes) fought long and hard for those Rights. Then Biden nominates KBJ and Democrats JUMP at the chance to erase 50 years of progress. 1972-2022. RIP Title IX.
And Kentanji Jackson was added because she’s a black woman.
In both cases, the candidates were on the list of people that were qualified for the position. So yes when examining list of candidates all with similar experience it was decided in both cases that other criteria would be beneficial for the supreme Court representation. But somehow when a Democrat does it it's bad but when a Republican does it it's not so bad.
Judge Brown Jackson knows if she is a woman or not.
Clearly, he/she does not. Or is it your contention he/she lied to Congress under oath?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.