Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What was the trap the GOP senators were trying to set for her?
What is "something," and why should it be inconsequential -- or consequential -- for her job qualifications?
I'm not trying to bait you; these are honest questions.
Good question. I'm more interested in why she is so against the sex offender's registry and why she has a history of defending sex offenders as well as having history of trying to overturn Trump's orders which would eventually be overturned by another judge.
I think Biden has set a precedent by establishing the race and gender of the nominee. If the next President says "I'm going to nominate a White man for the Supreme Court vacancy", I guess nobody can complain.
Who complained when then-candidate Ronald Reagan promised to name the first female Supreme Court justice in 1980?
Good question. I'm more interested in why she is so against the sex offender's registry and why she has a history of defending sex offenders as well as having history of trying to overturn Trump's orders which would eventually be overturned by another judge.
She answered those questions. Get a transcript and you will understand her logic. May not agree, but she did adress the topic directly.
I could paraphrase but best you read the exact response. Quit a few senators grilled her on this. She did not avoid or dance around the topic.
The Dems gave us the first black president, the first black vice president, and now the first black woman SCOTUS judge.
I don't t understand the above .....
.my understanding is and has been that the qualified adult is interrogated , background checked and either approved or dismissed from consideration.
I think the approval is qualified based.
Said the same when Kavanuagh was nominated . - qualified and approved.
Congrats are in order .
3 Republican senators voted yes, for a final vote of 53-47. She's in. I concur with Senator Murkowski (R-AK) who said that while she doesn't agree with everything Jackson stands for, she's a qualified candidate. I certainly don't agree with her stance on issues like CRT, but that alone isn't worth writing off a candidate. JMHO.
Last edited by MikefromCT; 04-07-2022 at 01:47 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
