Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Shame on anyone here using the "everyone else" crap*** excuse.....
I only mention what others did as to sentencing because of the allegation that Judge Jackson had a reputation of going light on defendants. She did not.
Plus, as she noted, she was a trial judge and it is wrong to try to focus in on one case and try to make some wide-ranging presumptions about her habits or capabilities.
I just thought of this today.. all the time we hear about activist judges whom - when the police capture a criminal - robber, etc. - the perp is let out of prison one day later. thanks to activist judges.. so this demon who wants to be the next supreme court justice is probably one of those activist judges.
if so, this has been going on for the last 10 or so years. maybe 5 years, i dont know. could that explain her reasoning on some of her answers like going soft on crime? apparently she is not the only one.
I just thought of this today.. all the time we hear about activist judges whom - when the police capture a criminal - robber, etc. - the perp is let out of prison one day later. thanks to activist judges.. so this demon who wants to be the next supreme court justice is probably one of those activist judges.
if so, this has been going on for the last 10 or so years. maybe 5 years, i dont know. could that explain her reasoning on some of her answers like going soft on crime? apparently she is not the only one.
All that recrimination and finger pointing and you end with *probably*. Nice. Just like Kavanaugh was *probably* a rapist.
Since when do you and Nancy Pelosi start thinking alike?
Honestly, she might be the most embarrassing SCOTUS justice ever. I look forward to laughing at her nonsense for the next few decades..... hopefully no ruling ever goes her way
Biden specifically said he was going to nominate a black woman.
Then proceeded to pick her.
That alone disqualifies her in my book. You're not going to get the best person for the job when you exclude like 80+% of the legal profession solely on the basis of race and sex.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.