Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can blame McCarthy and the GOP for not putting more members on the panel to push back. They had their chance, but decided to throw a tantrum instead.
So you admit for whatever reason is not an impartial hearing, it's 1 sided and no challenges from the minority party. You can blame McCarthy or Santa Clause or Big Foot but it doesn't change the fact it isn't an impartial hearing and all push 1 narrative.
If a black defendant doesn't get a fair hearing it doesn't change the fact if is the fault of is the lawyer, jury, judge or police. It's still a 1 sided hearing. You are putting blame but are not denying that is 1 sided.
The people asking the questions are anti-Trump. They voted for his impeachment. They only want a narrative so they ask their questions to get their answers. There is not an other side to challenge so their narrative is what gets pushed to the public. Stop with the garbage this is a fair hearing.
There’s no other side because McCarthy refused to seat anyone else. There are 210 republicans in the House and two of them are currently on the panel, he could have chosen any of the others after Pelosi declined to seat all of his initial picks. He decided that it would be more politically advantageous to refuse to select anyone else. So far, it seems to have backfired on him. Trump sure seems to think so as well. There really is no one else to blame but McCarthy.
There’s no other side because McCarthy refused to seat anyone else. There are 210 republicans in the House and two of them are currently on the panel, he could have chosen any of the others after Pelosi declined to seat all of his initial picks. He decided that it would be more politically advantageous to refuse to select anyone else. So far, it seems to have backfired on him. Trump sure seems to think so as well. There really is no one else to blame but McCarthy.
So you admit, it's a 1 sided hearing. You just blame McCarthy. That doesn't change the fact it's a 1 sided hearing.
So you admit for whatever reason is not an impartial hearing, it's 1 sided and no challenges from the minority party. You can blame McCarthy or Santa Clause or Big Foot but it doesn't change the fact it isn't an impartial hearing and all push 1 narrative.
If a black defendant doesn't get a fair hearing it doesn't change the fact if the fault is the lawyer, jury, judge or police. It's still a 1 sided trial. You are putting blame but are not denying that is 1 sided.
This isn’t a trial. All your comparisons to a criminal trial are moot because congressional hearings are not trials and don’t have to follow procedures of a criminal trial. As others have already stated, Trump and his minions are more than welcome to testify. And the GOP was invited to seat a number of people on the panel, but they refused. They are sabotaging their own hearings, and there’s no one to blame but themselves.
You can blame McCarthy and the GOP for not putting more members on the panel to push back. They had their chance, but decided to throw a tantrum instead.
BOTH impeachments weren't criminal trials, either. Neither were Trump's THREE SCOTUS picks/confirmations that got rammed through, despite McConnell stonewalling Obama's pick. The cognitive dissonance on the right would ordinarily be astounding, but they've elevated Trump to a Christ-like figure so don't expect them to accept any factual evidence at face value any time soon...
Something I was thinking about, in all fairness....
If there was "passenger/driver activity" in The Beast, 1) Wouldn't the Beast be "swerving" on Pennsylvania Avenue; and 2) Aren't there street cameras on Pennsylvania Avenue that would pick up the "swerves?"
I got responses indicating that I named the wrong type of car. But, my main question was as follows: 1) Whether, if there was any physical altercation between the President and the Secret Service driver, did the car swerve on the street? (whatever type of car, it was); and 2) Is there any video evidence, from a street camera, of that car swerving as evidence that something going on, in that car?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
