Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To the blindly partisan, a statement by one person equals the views of millions. That reveals quite a lot about the thought that goes into the OP's stances on issues.
So only two individuals on the right have voiced opinions on the spill? Good one. Many of the same individuals who have minimized the spill are the same ones who are slamming Obama, calling it his "Katrina" Do you feel this is Obama's Katrina, are you critical of his response?
2 different individuals with 2 different point of views? That is allowed right?
do you understand how its both, its a NATURAL disaster, the location has just changed. Oil after all, does appear in the environment..
That's a weird assessment. I fail to see how that disaster is natural. It is man-made, whether you like it or not. That oil would not be leaking right now if we had not drill a hole.
It's as if you detonated a nuclear bomb underwater and blamed nature for the ensuing tsunami, cuz after all, water is everywhere, right?
Or let's just drill massive holes and let the earth covered in magma...it's all natural
The point is, that catastrophe was triggered by human beings, not nature.
As for the right contradicting itself...since when are politicians consistent and not opportunistic?
guess he was dipping into the medicine cabinet again... No surprise about the stupidity from his mouth...
Everyone should know it is natural to have a 2000 ft hole bored into an oil deposit. What does it matter if we kill off the fishing in the Gulf. tell the fishermen to get real jobs, like being one to open ones mouth on the radio in order to fill dead air....
To the blindly partisan, a statement by one person equals the views of millions. That reveals quite a lot about the thought that goes into the OP's stances on issues.
Are you claiming that only one person has criticized Obama for the spill or has minimized the spill? What about you, are you critical of Obama's response?
Still smarting from criticism of the Bush Cheney response to Katrina, Cheney ordered Haliburton to fake a blowout on the Deep Horizon!
Of course such an accusation is beyond ridiculous but certainly no more ridiculous than the other conspiracy threads making the rounds.
So, join me in coming up with your own ridiculous conspiracy theory.
good idea, although with the extreme right wing of the republican party doing and saying the things they do and say. . . you had me going there for a minute. . . it's really not all that much more outrageous than the things they ARE saying. . . .although, presumably, from the other side.
How about it's an oil cartel plan to keep the US dependent on foreign oil (with the sure knowledge that we will be living in caves, and needing to re-invent candles) before we will have the political will to even consider other, cleaner sources of energy!
So only two individuals on the right have voiced opinions on the spill? Good one
You indeed are discussiong MORE THAN TWO individuals, while lumping them all together.. YOU are the one lumping them into a small group of ONE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holdencaulfield
Many of the same individuals who have minimized the spill are the same ones who are slamming Obama, calling it his "Katrina" Do you feel this is Obama's Katrina, are you critical of his response?
Are you saying Bush created Katrina? That also was a NATURAL disaster, and many on the left blamed Bush...
Do you not understand that its the INACTION of limiting the damage that is blamed on the presidents, not the actual acts?
That's a weird assessment. I fail to see how that disaster is natural. It is man-made, whether you like it or not. That oil would not be leaking right now if we had not drill a hole.
Are you claiming that only one person has criticized Obama for the spill or has minimized the spill? What about you, are you critical of Obama's response?
I haven't paid that much attention to his response to have a strong opinion on it. I think that he, along with others, was not sure of how large the spill was going to be. I also don't know enough about oil spills to know what could have been done sooner. I suspect that there are things that could have been done sooner and that it may have been wise to begin planning in case the spill did become as large as it has; however, I don't know that and it's all hindsight on my part.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.