Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1. But even with that, there will be people who will not be happy with who they are no matter what technology they use to change themselves.
2. I don't think that future technology is going to bring new happiness to people who aren't happy now.
3. Look at the progression of technology over the last 2,000 years -- people still mope around crying the woah is me song.
1. Sure, but there will also be people who are indeed happier.
2. I partially disagree with you on this. For instance, if someone is worried about death and/or finances, then if this individual wll survive until we are able to cheaply reverse aging and/or have a cornucopian society with guaranteed basic income of millions of dollars or whatever per year for everyone, then I think that such an individual might be (much) happier in the future.
3. Agreed, though overall, life right now is much better than it was 2,000 years ago, unless perhaps you're Jesus Christ.
1. Sure, but there will also be people who are indeed happier.
2. I partially disagree with you on this. For instance, if someone is worried about death and/or finances, then if this individual wll survive until we are able to cheaply reverse aging and/or have a cornucopian society with guaranteed basic income of millions of dollars or whatever per year for everyone, then I think that such an individual might be (much) happier in the future.
3. Agreed, though overall, life right now is much better than it was 2,000 years ago, unless perhaps you're Jesus Christ.
But think about it, a guaranteed basic income of whatever will buy you no more than you can buy today - it might even buy you less.
But think about it, a guaranteed basic income of whatever will buy you no more than you can buy today - it might even buy you less.
It would depend on how much things would cost at that point in time.
If we will have robots doing most of the work and production everywhere, then us humans might be able to automatically gain large amounts of purchasing power (as in having sufficient money to buy a huge amount of things) simply because of the massive productivity and output which robots will provide for us.
I might be reconsidering my previous definition of sex, considering that after thinking about it, things such as mammary intercourse might be considered sex as well.
However, AFAIK, there doesn't necessarily have to be any direct (skin) contact in the act of mutual masturbation.
Apparently, according to one person that wanted to mock me in a anonymouse rep, even A cups can do it, despite the biological improbability of that.
Who care. It's a ridiculous concept.
By the way, the rep wasn't from me. I came right out and asked about it on the boards. It does sound like you aren't willing to be flexible and try things that your partner might want to try. And yes, you don't have to have a pair of big boobs for this.
By the way, the rep wasn't from me. I came right out and asked about it on the boards. It does sound like you aren't willing to be flexible and try things that your partner might want to try. And yes, you don't have to have a pair of big boobs for this.
Apparently, according to one person that wanted to mock me in a anonymouse rep, even A cups can do it, despite the biological improbability of that.
Who care. It's a ridiculous concept.
Yeah, I'm an A cup and I just don't think it would work. I'd do it if I had C's though. lol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.