Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-06-2015, 11:10 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,171,503 times
Reputation: 40641

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
I find the problem with dating today is that too many people are exposed to porn or have different erotic preferences it makes having a first date romp really awkward.

There are some women that are already looking forward to romping on the 1st date and already insist what they want. It sort of killed the surprise element.

What is wrong with women knowing what they want and expressing that? Or am I misinterpreting what you're saying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-06-2015, 11:29 AM
 
3,588 posts, read 5,749,252 times
Reputation: 4793
To the ones who are saying their (now) husbands slept with them on the first date....I mean no harm, but I couldn't date or marry someone who pursued what he wanted from me sexually with that kind of doggishness. I don't consider men who come at you like that and they barely know you, as husband material. And I believe some of you who are saying this about your husbands...are not these men now your EX-husband?

Men can control themselves. They claim they can't because so many women have been willing to not require them to wait for sex. So now, it is an affront to them as a man and a person if they have to wait for sex. All this is: "entitlement" Male Princess Syndrome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 11:32 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,171,503 times
Reputation: 40641
Quote:
Originally Posted by laorbust61 View Post
Men can control themselves. They claim they can't because so many women have been willing to not require them to wait for sex. So now, it is an affront to them as a man and a person if they have to wait for sex. All this is: "entitlement" Male Princess Syndrome.

Why should men (or women) "control" their desire for sex? And why should women "require" them to wait for sex?

If two people want to have sex, why shouldn't they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 11:46 AM
 
3,588 posts, read 5,749,252 times
Reputation: 4793
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Why should men (or women) "control" their desire for sex? And why should women "require" them to wait for sex?

If two people want to have sex, why shouldn't they?
Even married people have to control the frequency and conditions under which they have sex...and it is biblically legal for them and (socially/morally) approved of, for them. They DO have other things to attend to in their marriage besides carnal relations.

Your statement almost sounds as if you think if a couple meet each other and they are with other people....it is okay for them to have sex, too. To say that "if two people want to have sex they should" almost sounds as if you think the couple should consider nothing else, except that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 11:52 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,171,503 times
Reputation: 40641
Quote:
Originally Posted by laorbust61 View Post
Even married people have to control the frequency and conditions under which they have sex...and it is biblically legal for them and (socially/morally) approved of, for them. They DO have other things to attend to in their marriage besides carnal relations.
I wasn't speaking specifically about married people and...
Biblically??!! Lost you there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by laorbust61 View Post
Your statement almost sounds as if you think if a couple meet each other and they are with other people....it is okay for them to have sex, too. To say that "if two people want to have sex they should" almost sounds as if you think the couple should consider nothing else, except that.


It is ok for them to have sex. Why would it not be? If they're free to have sex with each other (not in a monogamous relationship with someone else) then yes, of course it is ok.

I never said they should consider nothing else. If they want to consider other things they should. If they don't want to, they don't have to. That's between consenting adults. Personally I don't care for having sex with people I don't feel a connection with mentally; it just has never been my thing. I know plenty of people (men and women) that have sex with, and even prefer having sex with, people just because they want to have sex and they have no desire to see that person after on occasion; other times they would rather have a deeper connection. Neither is right or wrong, they're just different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 12:01 PM
 
Location: The Hall of Justice
25,899 posts, read 42,832,973 times
Reputation: 42769
Quote:
Originally Posted by laorbust61 View Post
To the ones who are saying their (now) husbands slept with them on the first date....I mean no harm, but I couldn't date or marry someone who pursued what he wanted from me sexually with that kind of doggishness. I don't consider men who come at you like that and they barely know you, as husband material. And I believe some of you who are saying this about your husbands...are not these men now your EX-husband?
We're still married. Yes, we are big sluts. We're okay with it.

Quote:
Men can control themselves. They claim they can't because so many women have been willing to not require them to wait for sex. So now, it is an affront to them as a man and a person if they have to wait for sex. All this is: "entitlement" Male Princess Syndrome.
Huh. We never had that conversation. I didn't want to wait so I didn't. I had known him for years, though, so he wasn't someone I had just met.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 12:34 PM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,678,561 times
Reputation: 12524
Quote:
Originally Posted by laorbust61 View Post
To the ones who are saying their (now) husbands slept with them on the first date....I mean no harm, but I couldn't date or marry someone who pursued what he wanted from me sexually with that kind of doggishness. I don't consider men who come at you like that and they barely know you, as husband material. And I believe some of you who are saying this about your husbands...are not these men now your EX-husband?

Men can control themselves. They claim they can't because so many women have been willing to not require them to wait for sex. So now, it is an affront to them as a man and a person if they have to wait for sex. All this is: "entitlement" Male Princess Syndrome.
See, not everyone sees sex as some sort of negotiation between men and women. That a man "doggishly" pursues sex and women either require them to wait or not.

Some people just view sex as a potentially enjoyable pastime, and simply evaluate whether or not they wish to have a sexual relationship with a particular person. No games.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 12:38 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,171,503 times
Reputation: 40641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petunia 100 View Post
See, not everyone sees sex as some sort of negotiation between men and women. That a man "doggishly" pursues sex and women either require them to wait or not.

Some people just view sex as a potentially enjoyable pastime, and simply evaluate whether or not they wish to have a sexual relationship with a particular person. No games.
That that that sounds sooo..... hmmmnnn, what is the word for it?

Healthy.

That's what I was looking for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 01:24 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,411 posts, read 15,655,689 times
Reputation: 4284
Quote:
Originally Posted by laorbust61 View Post
To the ones who are saying their (now) husbands slept with them on the first date....I mean no harm, but I couldn't date or marry someone who pursued what he wanted from me sexually with that kind of doggishness. I don't consider men who come at you like that and they barely know you, as husband material. And I believe some of you who are saying this about your husbands...are not these men now your EX-husband?

Men can control themselves. They claim they can't because so many women have been willing to not require them to wait for sex. So now, it is an affront to them as a man and a person if they have to wait for sex. All this is: "entitlement" Male Princess Syndrome.



I'm a male and I'm going to use that on a couple of males that I know........LOL Male Princess Syndrome.

FOMC...falling out of my chair Rep U
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2015, 01:41 PM
 
Location: "Silicon Valley" (part of San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA)
4,375 posts, read 4,090,448 times
Reputation: 2158
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJulia View Post
We're still married. Yes, we are big sluts. We're okay with it.
lol

Quote:
Huh. We never had that conversation. I didn't want to wait so I didn't. I had known him for years, though, so he wasn't someone I had just met.
Yeah see, if you knew them for a long time it happens naturally. To me that's meaningful and romantic sex. That's how I want it to happen. It hasn't worked yet, unfortunately. But I just don't feel comfortable with the other method, asking out strangers. I want to get to know them first, even if I feel like I've already started having romantic feelings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top