Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:43 PM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,204,963 times
Reputation: 2018

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Vizio, tell the complete truth. Why were they really fined? It was not just because they refuse the cake, you know that, you've been told that, yet you continually hearken back to that.

So why were they really fined?
They were fined because they opened their mouths. They were slapped down for daring to speak out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:45 PM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,204,963 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverEN View Post
Sooo... you think I'm the bigot because I think I deserve to be treated equally in public service? The old, "you should tolerate my intolerance of you" reasoning.
I never said that, did I?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:48 PM
 
19,942 posts, read 17,204,963 times
Reputation: 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
The baker does not PARTICIPATE in the wedding.

The baker bakes a cake, delivers the cake, and gets paid. They do not attend the wedding or the reception. They do not walk anyone down the aisle. They do not officiate. They do not toast the couple. They do not DJ.

Bake, deliver, leave. That is all.
By making a cake and delivering it, the baker is facilitating it. No different than the guy that photographs it.

For the life of me, I can't figure out why you'd want to force your views on someone else. Is there a shortage of bakers? Of course not--we all know the reason. We know that the only reason this was an issue was so that a bigoted gay couple could make an example of someone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:52 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,930,909 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
And none of that would have happened if the couple had simply respected someone's religious beliefs, ya know, like people used to do. Do we even know for sure their addresses got posted? The only source I've seen reporting it was an extremely liberal website reporting the story heavily sympathizing with the gay couple. Only a quick blurb about Sweet Cakes getting death threats even launched at their children. Yea your side is realllly tolerable.
Jeff.

Pay attention, I've ask this of you before.

If there were death threats, were the police informed. If not why not.

Please answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:56 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,930,909 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vizio View Post
They were fined because they opened their mouths. They were slapped down for daring to speak out.
We are heading in the right direction now. Do you want to give the complete story?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:57 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
4,422 posts, read 6,263,544 times
Reputation: 5429
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
Are the Christians out to get you?
Tomato Tomata
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 06:59 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,728,305 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
If that Dred Scott had "just followed the laws of his State", none of those problems would have happened.
And I got my information from the record of the "great" Supreme Court that affirmed it!!

It has been explained before...many times..."the law" is NOT a good arbiter!
Argue the concept...not the law relative to it. Laws mean squat! Otherwise Afghan men beating their wives half to death because they "disrespected" them, is totally cool....after all, it's "the law" there!
Especially in this case, because there is no law. Laws must be voted on and passed by the people. What we have here, like in most states where "gay" marriage is "legal", is a court ruling by a handful of misguided souls who ought never to be allowed anywhere near public policy making.

Excellent post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 07:11 PM
 
32,516 posts, read 37,198,776 times
Reputation: 32581
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewtexan View Post
Tomato Tomata
Jeffy only asked that because he, like Viz, parrots back what other people post. It's a "thing" with the fans of the aptly-named Slick. It allows them to think they've had a gotcha moment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Tulsa, OK
2,572 posts, read 4,254,228 times
Reputation: 2427
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownVic95 View Post
When I saw this thread title, I was certain that it was in jest or tongue-in-cheek. Because in a sane world, like the world I lived my earlier years in, it most certainly would be.

But no. Another sad reminder that everything is inside out and upside down now.
Yeah, your world is just getting smaller everyday...🌎
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2015, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,765,220 times
Reputation: 15482
Quote:
Originally Posted by GldnRule View Post
The government is overstepping its boundaries. They need to keep out of this...before the system we have is used against them. And the fallout affects everyone.
The Civil War was a great and noble cause...and many gave their lives or suffered terrible harm for that cause. I don't think the current crop of citizens in this country has that kinda guts and fortitude.
The religious outnumber the nonreligious in this country 4 to 1. So, guess how that battle (legal conflict or otherwise) will turn out in the end if both sides decide to go all out to "win"?
Why do you think that all voters who self-identify as religious agree with you?

Why do you think that all voters who self-identify as religious would be willing to carry out your threats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top