Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2009, 06:38 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,961,448 times
Reputation: 3545

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
Those figures are not correct census figures for San Antonio.

My figures are correct, I'm using census statistics. San Antonio had 1,324,000 in 1990 and 1,592,000 in 2000 and 2,031,884 in 2008. Going by these figures San Antonio out paced Austin metro between 2000-2008. Austin slowed down between 2000 and 2008. But Austin did out pace San Antonio between 1990 and 2008 overall. I'm estimating urbanized area by lastest census estimates based on population within an area. San Antonio basically has well over 500,000 more in i'ts core.
Just so you will know a lil about me, I picked up my first world atlas in my play pin at age 1, someone must have left it in there by mistake, there begin my love affair with maps and almanacs, never put them down since then, of course my hot wheels as well.
Uh, yes they are correct Census figures. They comes straight from the Census if you look at the link. Texas A&M just compiled the numbers. Yours are wrong. What was the story for? LOL. You can estimate urban areas all you want, but those only comes out every ten years. Urban areas have to have a certain density throughout.

And no imaterry, SA is NOT way larger than Austin.

 
Old 09-18-2009, 07:16 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,961,448 times
Reputation: 3545
Do you know how I know your numbers are really wrong? I looked at Houston's. There is no way Houston was that small in 2000. No way.

Houston: CensusScope -- Population Growth

That, and they have Dallas and Fort Worth split up. SA was NOT that small in 2000. That site is wrong. Hell, go look at the Wikipedia chart, with their references. I'll even link you: Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:02 AM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,113,771 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel713 View Post
Uh, yes they are correct Census figures. They comes straight from the Census if you look at the link. Texas A&M just compiled the numbers. Yours are wrong. What was the story for? LOL. You can estimate urban areas all you want, but those only comes out every ten years. Urban areas have to have a certain density throughout.

And no imaterry, SA is NOT way larger than Austin.
OMG the stats are in front of your face, shows the larger numerical gain, for County, City and Metro from 2000- to 2008. As far as urbanized area San Antonio had 427k more and now more than likely 500k, it may not be the ten year stats, just a estimate.

500,000 more people is like adding another good sized city. I really wouldn't say, way.... larger, just considerably larger, surely not equal or near equal in size. It is easy, just drive around both places, just comparing freeway infrastructure, built up area pretty much tells the story.
 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:09 AM
 
2,744 posts, read 6,113,771 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel713 View Post
Do you know how I know your numbers are really wrong? I looked at Houston's. There is no way Houston was that small in 2000. No way.

Houston: CensusScope -- Population Growth

That, and they have Dallas and Fort Worth split up. SA was NOT that small in 2000. That site is wrong. Hell, go look at the Wikipedia chart, with their references. I'll even link you: Table of United States Metropolitan Statistical Areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I saw that, it must be a adjustment back dating the 2000 and 1990 census, since the territory was adjusted. San Antonio was 1.324 million 1990 and 1.592 in 2000. Going by that adjustment would throw the figures off.
 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:18 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,961,448 times
Reputation: 3545
^^so, what would you say on Houston's WAY OFF numbers? Houston didn't add counties that would boost it's 2000 numbers that high. Therefore, your site is messed up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweethomeSanAntonio View Post
OMG the stats are in front of your face, shows the larger numerical gain, for County, City and Metro from 2000- to 2008. As far as urbanized area San Antonio had 427k more and now more than likely 500k, it may not be the ten year stats, just a estimate.

500,000 more people is like adding another good sized city. I really wouldn't say, way.... larger, just considerably larger, surely not equal or near equal in size. It is easy, just drive around both places, just comparing freeway infrastructure, built up area pretty much tells the story.
Haha, what?? I posted the stats that even show international and domestic migration, as well as births and deaths. What did you show? You can even go to county and state on the link I posted. Mine come from the Census. Your site's numbers are all over the place.
 
Old 09-18-2009, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,650,196 times
Reputation: 8617
Original topic long since abandoned....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top