Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > TV
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-21-2017, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,242,301 times
Reputation: 21241

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
Skimmed the article, didja?

He's talking two separate projects.
SaveSave
Actually, the way it is written it is not apparent at all that two different films were being contemplated. One could interpret it either way.

Hopefully your interpretation is correct since the alternative fails to make sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2017, 07:45 PM
 
16,447 posts, read 12,624,041 times
Reputation: 59783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
Actually, the way it is written it is not apparent at all that two different films were being contemplated. One could interpret it either way.

Hopefully your interpretation is correct since the alternative fails to make sense.

Actually, it's quite apparent. "As well as the prequel" = in addition to the prequel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 12:53 AM
 
Location: Steele Creek, Charlotte, NC
1,907 posts, read 2,276,989 times
Reputation: 3338
The prequel and movie with the old cast are two separate things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 06:26 AM
 
Location: Not where I want to be
24,509 posts, read 24,271,484 times
Reputation: 24282
Either way, I don't care. Downton is over, I have moved on. Perhaps if there were a SERIES prequel, I would watch but not movies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 06:32 AM
 
16,447 posts, read 12,624,041 times
Reputation: 59783
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamiznluv View Post
Either way, I don't care. Downton is over, I have moved on. Perhaps if there were a SERIES prequel, I would watch but not movies.
The prequel is rumored to be a television series; the reunion rumored to be a movie.

I think I may be the only one who read the article. LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,242,301 times
Reputation: 21241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
Actually, it's quite apparent. "As well as the prequel" = in addition to the prequel.
Again, no.

Quote:
As well as the prequel, Julian is still hoping that he can round up the old cast - comprised of Michelle Dockery, Dame Maggie Smith, Hugh Bonneville and Jim Carter - so that he can make a successful blockbuster based on the period drama.
The proper way to have written this would have been:
"In addition to the prequel, Julian is hoping to make a sequel featuring the old cast." That makes it clear that two films are being planned. The way it is written above, the "successful blockbuster" could reference the prequel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 07:06 AM
 
16,447 posts, read 12,624,041 times
Reputation: 59783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
Again, no.


The proper way to have written this would have been:
"In addition to the prequel, Julian is hoping to make a sequel featuring the old cast." That makes it clear that two films are being planned. The way it is written above, the "successful blockbuster" could reference the prequel.
I'm sorry that you don't understand the simple phrase "as well as." There's nothing wrong with the way it's written. Just your comprehension.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Not where I want to be
24,509 posts, read 24,271,484 times
Reputation: 24282
Meow
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,242,301 times
Reputation: 21241
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
There's nothing wrong with the way it's written. Just your comprehension.
I make no claims for the viability of my comprehension, but I do not agree that there was nothing wrong with the way it was written.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 03:27 PM
 
3,805 posts, read 6,373,462 times
Reputation: 7862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
I make no claims for the viability of my comprehension, but I do not agree that there was nothing wrong with the way it was written.
To-may-toes, to-mah-toes, po-tay-toes, po-tah-toes. Either way is correct and each delivers the correct information. This degree of parsing is kind of ridiculous.

That said, I'd be eager to see both of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > TV

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top