Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would say a climate that has a lesser degree of disruption to its ecology/natural environment during the winter months, is more subtropical than any climate with a greater degree of disruption, no matter how hot it gets at any either time of the year.
I would say a climate that has a lesser degree of disruption to its ecology/natural environment during the winter months, is more subtropical than any climate with a greater degree of disruption, no matter how hot it gets at any either time of the year.
But then theoretically you could have a subtropical climate with winter high/low of 50f/40f, and summer temps of 55f/45f. Despite a lack of winter freezes, what a lousy and cold subtropical climate that would be. I'd rather live in a climate like DC vs that eternal chill.
But then theoretically you could have a subtropical climate with winter high/low of 50f/40f, and summer temps of 55f/45f. Despite a lack of winter freezes, what a lousy and cold subtropical climate that would be. I'd rather live in a climate like DC vs that eternal chill.
Where is such a climate then?
Using real world climates, I think the idea of less disruption of ecology, is far superior to any other benchmark for identifying whether a climate is more/less subtropical.
In theory, climates systems are objective, identifying patterns of weather/climate and cause and effect, independent of human likes or dislikes. I think how nature responds to seasonal shifts of any place, is a far better indicator of determining how subtropical a climate is.
But then theoretically you could have a subtropical climate with winter high/low of 50f/40f, and summer temps of 55f/45f. Despite a lack of winter freezes, what a lousy and cold subtropical climate that would be. I'd rather live in a climate like DC vs that eternal chill.
I agree. Based on Joe's criteria, the Faroe Islands are subtropical because there isn't much disruption between summer and winter. I imagine it would look not much different there between summer and winter with only 7C difference between the warmest month and the coldest month.
I agree. Based on Joe's criteria, the Faroe Islands are subtropical because there isn't much disruption between summer and winter. I imagine it would look not much different there between summer and winter with only 7C difference between the warmest month and the coldest month.
I wouldn't say that the Faroe Islands are Subtropical, but more subtropical.
I agree. Based on Joe's criteria, the Faroe Islands are subtropical because there isn't much disruption between summer and winter. I imagine it would look not much different there between summer and winter with only 7C difference between the warmest month and the coldest month.
After looking at Macquaire Island's climate stats, I think you're right.
What I should have said, is that a location with higher levels of winter plant/animal activity, is more subtropical than area with lower levels of winter activity.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.