Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2010, 10:34 PM
 
273 posts, read 957,264 times
Reputation: 190

Advertisements

Subaru's new CVT auto gets better EPA ratings than its stick. (It is not as much fun to drive though). Things may be changing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2010, 10:40 PM
 
1,628 posts, read 4,040,058 times
Reputation: 541
To paraphrase Dennis Simanaitis: We are becoming a shiftless lot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2010, 01:39 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,309,299 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Stern View Post
No, automatics are boring and my grandmother can manually shift her auto shift. So? As far as fuel economy is concerned. Nobody with an automatic can get 35 mpg (as I do with my Firebird 3.8) driving in Toronto. I consistantly get 40 to 42 mpg on the highway and the reason is the lack of a torque convertor. The only automatics that come close to manuals in fuel economy are large semi-trucks with multi speed transmissions and NO Torque convertor. The truth is, nobody in our affluent society gives a rip about fuel economy or skillful driving. Too bad!
Really? Every single car with an automatic is "boring?" Even a 500 hp Corvette?
Or a classic car like a 427 Yenko Camaro (a solid 12-second car) is "boring?"

Automatics do have an advantage of high speeds in each gear. For instance, this '68 Dodge Charger R/T with 426-Hemi, 3-speed auto and 3.23:1 axle ratio.

Speed in gears @ rpm:
1st----------- 63 mph @ 6500 rpm
2nd---------- 107 mph @ 6500 rpm
3rd---------- 139 mph @ 5800 rpm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2010, 07:46 AM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,963,815 times
Reputation: 7365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narfcake View Post
Borg Warner 35, used by several manufacturers back then. AMC, MG, and Jaguar springs to my mind ...

It was smooth ... and that's about the nicest thing I could say about it, because whatever power the engine had at the crank, you're not going to get anywhere near that amount afterwards.
Yeah that name sounds familar. I didn't bother to remember junk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2010, 09:48 PM
 
22 posts, read 144,073 times
Reputation: 19
Yup, great ladies cars. Boring.....Now if you're not a very good driver, you have to go for the auto shift. I cringe when I watch some of these guy drive a 5 speed. Pretty rough. And my grandmother can squeeze a throttle to the floor, but she's not too good with a stick. Yawn, yawn....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2010, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,309,299 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Stern View Post
Yup, great ladies cars. Boring.....Now if you're not a very good driver, you have to go for the auto shift. I cringe when I watch some of these guy drive a 5 speed. Pretty rough. And my grandmother can squeeze a throttle to the floor, but she's not too good with a stick. Yawn, yawn....
Interesting... I see quite a few good drivers with 12-second muscle cars with automatics at the weekly car gathering. Maybe I should tell them that they are driving "ladies cars," the next time they are blasting down the 1/4 mile!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 08:16 AM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,343,711 times
Reputation: 2901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Interesting... I see quite a few good drivers with 12-second muscle cars with automatics at the weekly car gathering. Maybe I should tell them that they are driving "ladies cars," the next time they are blasting down the 1/4 mile!
You should remember to let them know that any old grandma can drive fast in a 1/4 mile straight road too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,309,299 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
You should remember to let them know that any old grandma can drive fast in a 1/4 mile straight road too.
Can any old grandma handle a 500-hp car and run a 12-second 1/4 mile?

Also, remember there are some grandmas who can drive a car with a manual transmission... does that mean they are "manly?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 01:48 PM
 
4,500 posts, read 12,343,711 times
Reputation: 2901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Can any old grandma handle a 500-hp car and run a 12-second 1/4 mile?

Also, remember there are some grandmas who can drive a car with a manual transmission... does that mean they are "manly?"
It means the know how to drive a proper car.

500hp and an Auto? floor it and keep it straight, you know it can't be hard when a Tv presenter was taught how to drive a top fuel drag racer in 2 hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2010, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,309,299 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheViking85 View Post
It means the know how to drive a proper car.

500hp and an Auto? floor it and keep it straight, you know it can't be hard when a Tv presenter was taught how to drive a top fuel drag racer in 2 hours.
What about driving an automatic-equipped car on mountain roads? Downshifting through curves, accelerating coming out of the turn, etc.

I find it hard to believe that only cars with manual transmissions are fun to drive.
As I posted above, what about a '69 427 Yenko Camaro with an automatic? No fun to drive strictly because it's an automatic?

Or another example I posted earlier... a '68 Dodge Charger with 426-Hemi, 3-speed auto and 3.23 gears. It could do 63 mph @ 6500 rpm in 1st gear and 107 mph @ 6500 rpm in 2nd gear... but because it has an auto, it's "no fun" to drive? I strongly disagree.

When I referred to a 500 hp car with an auto, I meant those I see regularly at car shows. They are street driven and are not just run at a race track.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top