Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-26-2017, 04:21 AM
 
10,839 posts, read 14,737,329 times
Reputation: 7874

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
That's not because of the climate, it's entirely because of the economy.

But I guess thinking it's about climate is better than the way most Americans erroneously think it's all about them and wanting to be close to them.

you are kind of talking against yourself.

 
Old 07-26-2017, 04:34 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,507,590 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by saturno_v View Post
....and if they have the financial means many eventually become snowbirds.....I never heard of beachbirds flocking north in summertime....
Then you aren't old enough or spent enough to have ever lived on a lake in Canada.

Just a sampling of some who do. Very big thing back in the day as virtually every lake in Ontario had American owned summer homes on them. Lodges in the areas of North Bay and Temagami area were owned by American companies with their executives clamouring to bring their families north out of the sweltering heat of a stinky city summer south of the 49th.

Here are 10 big-time celebs who cottage right here in Canada.
Martin Short: Lake Rosseau.
Jim Carrey: Baptiste Lake.
Steven Spielberg: Muskoka.
Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell: Lake Rosseau.
Kate Hudson: Muskoka.
Donald Sutherland: Georgeville.
Tom Hanks: Muskoka.
Halle Berry: Saint-Hippolyte.

An article that describes a bit of it in earlier times.

Muskoka: The Malibu of the North - The New York Times

Takes some serious cash for folks like Ted Rogers, but the millionaires and billionaires seem to be willing to spend it to get away from the U.S. and come to Canada for whatever reasons that have been mentioned on here any number of times but ignored or discounted by some..
 
Old 07-26-2017, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Cambridge, MA/London, UK
3,871 posts, read 5,297,409 times
Reputation: 3371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/thou...lide=1.3351399

The link is weird, you have to click on the four little squares that make one square in the top right hand cornet to get all the photos.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saturno_v View Post
So where you trying to get at?? I can find pictures of extreme poverty in Canada too....wake up...














Remains of a homeless park in Stanley Park....
Ooooh! Using other peoples pain and suffering to win an internet argument! How classy and mature of you two.
 
Old 07-26-2017, 10:09 AM
 
3,950 posts, read 3,309,134 times
Reputation: 1694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
That's not because of the climate, it's entirely because of the economy, geography and the water-ways. But I think you already know that and are pretending that you don't. Or maybe you really don't know that. If not, why not? What's the matter with you? Were you born and raised in a hot country?

I'm not talking about the historical reason why the country started in that area.....it stayed that way until now....and for a reason...90%+ of the Canadian population live within 100 miles from the US border...and weather has a lot to do with it, not all but a lot....the more northern regions are simply hard to develop.
 
Old 07-26-2017, 10:15 AM
 
3,950 posts, read 3,309,134 times
Reputation: 1694
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Then you aren't old enough or spent enough to have ever lived on a lake in Canada.

Just a sampling of some who do. Very big thing back in the day as virtually every lake in Ontario had American owned summer homes on them. Lodges in the areas of North Bay and Temagami area were owned by American companies with their executives clamouring to bring their families north out of the sweltering heat of a stinky city summer south of the 49th.

Here are 10 big-time celebs who cottage right here in Canada.
Martin Short: Lake Rosseau.
Jim Carrey: Baptiste Lake.
Steven Spielberg: Muskoka.
Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell: Lake Rosseau.
Kate Hudson: Muskoka.
Donald Sutherland: Georgeville.
Tom Hanks: Muskoka.
Halle Berry: Saint-Hippolyte.

An article that describes a bit of it in earlier times.

Muskoka: The Malibu of the North - The New York Times

Takes some serious cash for folks like Ted Rogers, but the millionaires and billionaires seem to be willing to spend it to get away from the U.S. and come to Canada for whatever reasons that have been mentioned on here any number of times but ignored or discounted by some..

Oh, please......you really want to want compare the two?? Bunch of celebrities and millionaires owns property in Canada?? Really??....yes I'm pretty sure that there is a wave of people comparable to the snowbirds that move to Canada in summer, I heard they are building a city like Phoenix in northern Alberta ......furthermore, there is no shortage of cooler areas by lakes in summer where you can have a nice cottage in the US.
The most ironic part is that this comes from you, a snowbird yourself......when arguing for the sake of arguing beats reasoning....
 
Old 07-26-2017, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Canada
7,309 posts, read 9,338,713 times
Reputation: 9859
Well, as we like to say here in Manitoba, the cold winters help to keep the riff-raff out.
 
Old 07-26-2017, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Canada
7,309 posts, read 9,338,713 times
Reputation: 9859
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruSan View Post
Then you aren't old enough or spent enough to have ever lived on a lake in Canada.

Just a sampling of some who do. Very big thing back in the day as virtually every lake in Ontario had American owned summer homes on them. Lodges in the areas of North Bay and Temagami area were owned by American companies with their executives clamouring to bring their families north out of the sweltering heat of a stinky city summer south of the 49th.

Here are 10 big-time celebs who cottage right here in Canada.
Martin Short: Lake Rosseau.
Jim Carrey: Baptiste Lake.
Steven Spielberg: Muskoka.
Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell: Lake Rosseau.
Kate Hudson: Muskoka.
Donald Sutherland: Georgeville.
Tom Hanks: Muskoka.
Halle Berry: Saint-Hippolyte.

An article that describes a bit of it in earlier times.

Muskoka: The Malibu of the North - The New York Times

Takes some serious cash for folks like Ted Rogers, but the millionaires and billionaires seem to be willing to spend it to get away from the U.S. and come to Canada for whatever reasons that have been mentioned on here any number of times but ignored or discounted by some..
Very true and not to mention all the regular folk hunters and fishermen who come up here. I worked one summer at a camp on the lake. One of my nieces worked two months at a fly-in fishing camp last summer. I think it was all Americans. She netted $13,000 with all the tips. I told her it helps to be blonde and beautiful.
 
Old 07-26-2017, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Canada
14,735 posts, read 15,066,361 times
Reputation: 34872
Quote:
Originally Posted by botticelli View Post
you are kind of talking against yourself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by saturno_v View Post
I'm not talking about the historical reason why the country started in that area.....it stayed that way until now....and for a reason...90%+ of the Canadian population live within 100 miles from the US border...and weather has a lot to do with it, not all but a lot....the more northern regions are simply hard to develop.

No. You are both not putting your thinking caps on. Now pay attention boys. Pretend for a moment that the Canada/USA border had ended up being another 500 or more miles further south than it is, and pretend that the climate of all of Canada is as balmy as the climate of southern British Columbia, or all as frigid as Baffin Island. The higher percentage of Canadian population would still be exactly where it is today because of the geography.

Not because of climate, not because of proximity to USA. The REASON is because of the water ways and the lay of the land right across the continent from coast to coast. It is the way it was with the people who were here long before Europe discovered North America. The settlers who came here continued in the same locations as those original inhabitants because it was the most practical and economical thing to do and as the population continues to grow and expand out more across the nation it will still remain that way with the greater majority of populace being where it is now because it's the most practical and economical thing to do.

It started because of Highway H2O, the St. Lawrence and the Great Lakes: St. Lawrence River - The Canadian Encyclopedia

The industry of the Seaway System: Seaway System - Business And Industry

"Comprised of the St. Lawrence River, St. Lawrence Seaway and the Great Lakes, Hwy H2O is a 3,700-kilometer (2,300 mile) marine highway that runs between Canada and the United States. Hwy H2O flows directly into our commercial, industrial and agricultural heartland, home to some 100 million people, roughly one quarter of the Canada/U.S. combined population."


It's the same reason why Vancouver is where it is, because of the Fraser River and its tributaries and the geography of the Fraser Basin.

After Highway H20 was more established the railway across Canada came next and it was built in the only place where it was geographically feasible, and then all the other infrastructure and people and towns who come with infrastructure followed after the railroad.

None of it had anything to do with proximity to USA and the border, none of it had anything to do with the climate. They are coincidental.


.
 
Old 07-26-2017, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Canada
7,309 posts, read 9,338,713 times
Reputation: 9859
^^Exactly, Zoiste.
 
Old 07-26-2017, 12:13 PM
 
3,950 posts, read 3,309,134 times
Reputation: 1694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
No. You are both not putting your thinking caps on. Now pay attention boys.

.
Nonsense...Canada with "balmy weather" would mean Northwest passage easily open to navigation and much easier resource extraction in the north.......yes it would change things...a lot....


You are the one that need to put your thinking hat on...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top